Read Summary of Decision

Jackson, charged with misdemeanors, including DWI, and traffic infractions, moved for dismissal of the actions on speedy trial grounds. The action was commenced Nov. 22, 2013 at Jackson’s arraignment, but after numerous adjournments, including because prosecutors were not ready, announced readiness off-calendar, Jackson brought the subject motion. He relied on People v. Sibblies arguing prosecutors should be charged with eight adjournments as they were not ready for trial on eight successive times. The court noted the issue in Sibbblies was if off-calendar statements of readiness were belied by prosecutors’ subsequent failure to be ready when the case was calendared. Prosecutors argued Sibblies did not apply as they announced in court, rather than off-calendar, their trial readiness. The court noted any statement of readiness must reflect actual readiness. It found as the total chargeable time was 150 days, exceeding the 90-day allotment, dismissal of the misdemeanor charges on speedy-trial grounds was granted. The speedy trial statute did not apply to traffic infractions and as the five factors that must be considered to decide if Jackson was denied his constitutional right to a speedy trial, taken together, did not indicate he was so deprived, dismissal was denied.