A statute that permits medical experts to issue anonymous opinions during "trial preparation" does not extend to the moving party in a summary judgment motion, a unanimous upstate appellate panel has held.
July 15, 2014 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
ALBANY – A statute that permits medical experts to issue anonymous opinions during “trial preparation” does not extend to the moving party in a summary judgment motion, a unanimous upstate appellate panel has held.
The Appellate Division, Third Department, on Thursday said the moving party in a summary judgment motion may not withhold experts’ identities.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
