The stage is now set for the U.S. Supreme Court to decide whether the Defense of Marriage Act's definition of marriage as an institution that is the exclusive domain of heterosexuals violates the Constitution.
February 28, 2013 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The stage is now set for the U.S. Supreme Court to decide whether the Defense of Marriage Act’s definition of marriage as an institution that is the exclusive domain of heterosexuals violates the Constitution.
Lawyers for Edith Windsor filed their brief with the court on Feb. 26, arguing that DOMA’s exclusion of same-sex married couples from federal benefits should be struck down because it violates the guarantee of equal protection under the law.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
