In the wake of the financial crisis, credit rating agencies have been named in dozens of lawsuits by investors seeking to recover on the huge losses suffered when the subprime market collapsed. Despite widely reported shortcomings in recent years, the rating agencies have largely prevailed in these cases on motions to dismiss. In the few cases in which plaintiffs have been allowed to proceed to discovery, it is hardly certain that the rating agencies will face substantial liability for their contribution to the subprime collapse.
While courts have begun to address claims for alleged past misconduct, the new Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act relaxes the pleading standard in future private securities cases against rating agencies and rescinds a Securities and Exchange Commission rule which previously exempted rating agencies from liability for false ratings in public registration statements. The new law increases the rating agencies’ future exposure to civil liability. Below, we examine how rating agencies have fared in the courts to date and how they might fare under the new rules.
Rating Agencies in the Courts
