This decision involved motions for summary judgment made by the plaintiffs and the defendants in an action involving a mixed-use development and related land use issues.

The plaintiffs sought “declarations that the nay votes” cast by two town board members “effectively defeating plaintiffs’ ability to develop the commercial golf club aspect of the overall project be overturned, that the project local law be deemed enacted/directing the town board to enact the local law and approve the project; that damages be awarded to plaintiffs, and that reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs of litigation also be awarded to plaintiffs.”