Scott Mollen discusses “Hieber Astoria LLC v. Taverna where the subject complaint was held to sufficiently state a pierce the corporate veil claim,” and “Matter of Samaritan-Compass VI Housing Development Fund Corporation v. 1293-95 Rodman, where the Appellate Division affirmed a trial court granting of a petitioner’s motion to hold the respondent in contempt of an order granting petitioner access to the respondent’s property.
September 05, 2023 at 10:57 AM
10 minute read
Piercing the Corporate Veil—Complaint—Breach of Contract—Tortious Interference With Contract—Breach of Fiduciary Duties—Accounting
Plaintiffs alleged that the defendant committed fraud and overcharged a property owner (owner) for renovation work that had never been authorized or even performed. The defendant had moved to dismiss the complaint.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
Scott Mollen
