In a brief filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on Friday, attorneys representing President Donald Trump argued that the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office reached beyond the scope of its investigation when it issued a grand jury subpoena for eight years of the president’s financial records in the summer of 2019.

Trump sued District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. in response to the subpoena, arguing at first that presidents are immune from state investigations. The U.S. Supreme Court rejected the blanket immunity argument in a 7-2 ruling in July but allowed Trump to make more specific arguments related to the subpoena in the lower courts.