Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Dollar SignSummary judgment is a critical tool in the litigator’s cost control arsenal as it can save both parties from incurring astronomical trial costs in cases where arguably no triable issues exist. Under the New York CPLR, however, the denial of a strong summary judgment motion presents the moving party with a conundrum: The denial order is immediately appealable; but that appeal does not stay the trial. As a result, both the attorney and the client must bear the intense financial burden of a two-front war, and simultaneously prepare for both trial and appeal. To alleviate the strain on both parties and overburdened trial courts, we propose amending the CPLR to encourage discretionary stays of the underlying trial while an appeal of a dispositive summary judgment motion is pending. For guidance, we look to the framework crafted by the federal courts for permitting interlocutory appeals of Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(f) motions for class certification.

Stays of enforcement pending appeal are largely governed by CPLR 5519. Although at first glance 5519(a) appears to contain a lengthy list of situations in which an automatic stay is available, it is largely inapplicable to interlocutory appeals unless the government is a party. Technically, discretionary stays of interlocutory appeals are available under CPLR 5519(c) from either the trial or appellate court, but that provision provides no guidance as to when a stay is warranted. (The same holds true for the trial court’s power to grant discretionary stays generally under CPLR 2201). Thus, stays are notoriously difficult to obtain absent a very favorable judge.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]


Encyclopedia of New York Causes of Action: Elements and DefensesBook

Compiles, outlines and indexes over 450 theories of recovery under New York State Law.

Get More Information

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.