Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Lewis R. Clayton and Eric Alan Stone Lewis R. Clayton and Eric Alan Stone

The “government edicts” doctrine precludes copyright protection for certain government works, such as state and federal statutes and judicial decisions. The Supreme Court has not addressed the doctrine in over 100 years, and lower courts have struggled with it, calling it “difficult to apply when the material in question does not fall neatly into the categories of statutes or judicial opinions.” John G. Danielson v. Winchester-Conant Props., 322 F.3d 26, 38 (1st Cir. 2003). In its upcoming October Term, the court will decide whether the doctrine precludes Georgia from copyrighting the annotations in the Official Code of Georgia Annotated (OCGA). State of Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, No. 18-1150 (2019). The court’s holding may affect not only the state of Georgia but the 20 other states that have registered copyrights in all or part of their state codes, and may have implications for the copyright status of other government-approved works.

This premium content is locked for
New York Law Journal subscribers only.

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?
Interested in customizing your subscription with Law.com All Access?
Contact our Sales Professionals at 1-855-808-4530 or send an email to groupsales@alm.com to learn more.


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2019 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.