Voting at a polling place on Trinity Place
U.S. District Judge Alison Nathan said in a decision that while the section of state election law that allowed the purge may not be unconstitutional, the way it was applied by the state is less clear.
October 01, 2018 at 06:38 PM
1 minute read
A lawsuit spurned after thousands of voters were purged from local polling books before the 2016 elections will move forward after a federal judge partly rejected a motion to dismiss the litigation from the state Board of Elections.
U.S. District Judge Alison Nathan of the Southern District of New York said in her decision that while the section of state election law that allowed the purge may not be unconstitutional, the way it was applied by the state is less clear.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
