“And I’m answering a lot of questions about 'Roe,' which I think indicates that 'Roe' doesn’t fall in that category,” Barrett said.
October 13, 2020 at 03:45 PM
1 minute read
Fifteen years after the term “super precedent” first surfaced during the Supreme Court confirmation hearings for now-Chief Justice John Roberts Jr., U.S. senators still seek an answer from nominees on whether the landmark abortion decision Roe v. Wade qualifies.
Trump nominee Judge Amy Coney Barrett on Tuesday declined to be pinned down on Roe as “super precedent,” saying, instead, it depends on how the term is defined.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The National Law Journal Elite Trial Lawyers recognizes U.S.-based law firms performing exemplary work on behalf of plaintiffs.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
Breaking news and trends for law firm and legal departments about the evolving federal regulations in a volatile political climate.
Judge Amy Coney Barrett, President Trump’s nominee to be Associate Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee in Washington, on Tuesday, October 13, 2020. Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM
