Ryerson University's New Incubator Is for Legal Tech Startups Ready for the Next Step
A global pandemic won't stop legal tech innovation, Ryerson University hopes. The Toronto university launched its third legal tech incubator program and joins a growing list of organizations aiming to help early stage legal tech companies.
June 26, 2020 at 10:00 AM
3 minute read
|
Launching a new company in the midst of a global pandemic might be too risky for some, but Ryerson University wants to help develop promising international early stage legal tech startups with its new program.
The Toronto-based school's Legal Innovation Zone is currently accepting applicants for its latest legal tech entrepreneur program, Sprint Studio. It's a free, web-based 12-week program that provides customer development skills and helps participants build a legal tech idea into a product, explained LIZ director Hersh Perlis.
The program is set to begin in September with a weekly online course focused on developing skills to create a product for a notoriously tech-averse market base. The program will also provide access to legal tech and general tech startup entrepreneur mentors, Perlis noted.
Sprint Studio is an extension of last year's Concept Framework and Sprint Lab programs, which were international spinoffs of Ryerson's original incubator Legal Innovation Zone launched in 2015. Concept Framework and Sprint Lab brought Legal Innovation Zone to international early stage legal companies, Perlis noted. Sprint Studio, however, is geared toward legal tech companies that are further along in development, although a product isn't required.
"You need a minimum valuable plan," Perlis said of potential applicants. "You have to have more than a thought, and you have to be serious about starting a company in legal tech. This isn't, 'Oh I think I have an idea, it may work.' That was more Concept Framework."
Similar to must incubators, Sprint Studio is looking for applicants that pitch a unique idea that has a solid potential market base and founders that believe in the idea.
While much of the legal industry is still reluctant to adopt technology, Perlis argued that new legal technology is likely to succeed when it automates or streamlines a service a lawyer can't or is difficult to charge a client for.
Still, "there's a whole bigger question about legal tech and servicing law firms and the dichotomy of being more cost-efficient and the billable hour, which unfortunately hampers legal tech," Perlis said.
Despite the stigma that lawyers are reluctant to embrace technology, budding legal tech companies are finding various international outlets to help break into the market.
Like Ryerson, universities have also become a haven for legal tech business development. Duke Law Tech Lab's pre-accelerator program, for example, helps companies weather startup and legal tech-specific hurdles. Law schools are also encouraging students to develop legal tech entrepreneurial skills at Suffolk University Law School, Cornell Law School and Hofstra University, among others.
Law firms are also launching incubator programs for legal tech companies, including India-based Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, which in May graduated its first group of legal tech companies from its development program. Legal tech startups can also find mentoring opportunities in the Big Four, with PwC announcing its second class of incubator participants in May after launching its program in 2019. While PwC was the first of the Big Four to start a legal tech incubator, Deloitte also launched a similar program in December 2019.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Bucking Industry Trend, Sidley Austin Elects Biggest Class of Partners in Firm History
- 2US Judge Throws Out Sale of Infowars to The Onion. But That's Not the End of the Road for Sandy Hook Families
- 3‘Really Deflating’: Judges React to Biden Threat to Veto New Judgeships Bill
- 43 Incidents Lead to Charges Against the Alexander Brothers; Cousin Remains at Large
- 5Sidley Austin Elects Biggest Combined Class of Partners and Counsel in Firm History
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250