Ryerson University's New Incubator Is for Legal Tech Startups Ready for the Next Step
A global pandemic won't stop legal tech innovation, Ryerson University hopes. The Toronto university launched its third legal tech incubator program and joins a growing list of organizations aiming to help early stage legal tech companies.
June 26, 2020 at 10:00 AM
3 minute read
Launching a new company in the midst of a global pandemic might be too risky for some, but Ryerson University wants to help develop promising international early stage legal tech startups with its new program.
The Toronto-based school's Legal Innovation Zone is currently accepting applicants for its latest legal tech entrepreneur program, Sprint Studio. It's a free, web-based 12-week program that provides customer development skills and helps participants build a legal tech idea into a product, explained LIZ director Hersh Perlis.
The program is set to begin in September with a weekly online course focused on developing skills to create a product for a notoriously tech-averse market base. The program will also provide access to legal tech and general tech startup entrepreneur mentors, Perlis noted.
Sprint Studio is an extension of last year's Concept Framework and Sprint Lab programs, which were international spinoffs of Ryerson's original incubator Legal Innovation Zone launched in 2015. Concept Framework and Sprint Lab brought Legal Innovation Zone to international early stage legal companies, Perlis noted. Sprint Studio, however, is geared toward legal tech companies that are further along in development, although a product isn't required.
"You need a minimum valuable plan," Perlis said of potential applicants. "You have to have more than a thought, and you have to be serious about starting a company in legal tech. This isn't, 'Oh I think I have an idea, it may work.' That was more Concept Framework."
Similar to must incubators, Sprint Studio is looking for applicants that pitch a unique idea that has a solid potential market base and founders that believe in the idea.
While much of the legal industry is still reluctant to adopt technology, Perlis argued that new legal technology is likely to succeed when it automates or streamlines a service a lawyer can't or is difficult to charge a client for.
Still, "there's a whole bigger question about legal tech and servicing law firms and the dichotomy of being more cost-efficient and the billable hour, which unfortunately hampers legal tech," Perlis said.
Despite the stigma that lawyers are reluctant to embrace technology, budding legal tech companies are finding various international outlets to help break into the market.
Like Ryerson, universities have also become a haven for legal tech business development. Duke Law Tech Lab's pre-accelerator program, for example, helps companies weather startup and legal tech-specific hurdles. Law schools are also encouraging students to develop legal tech entrepreneurial skills at Suffolk University Law School, Cornell Law School and Hofstra University, among others.
Law firms are also launching incubator programs for legal tech companies, including India-based Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, which in May graduated its first group of legal tech companies from its development program. Legal tech startups can also find mentoring opportunities in the Big Four, with PwC announcing its second class of incubator participants in May after launching its program in 2019. While PwC was the first of the Big Four to start a legal tech incubator, Deloitte also launched a similar program in December 2019.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 2Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 3‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 4State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 5Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250