On-Premise Tech's Swan Song? Pandemic Places Greater Emphasis on the Cloud
The market demand to develop cloud-based legal tech solutions will only grow as more lawyers and staffers become acclimated to working remotely.
March 20, 2020 at 10:30 AM
3 minute read
Cloud-based legal technology has spent roughly the last five years highlighting its benefits and pushing back against the notion that it's an ethical or security liability. Now, as more legal professionals shift to substantially working remotely during the COVID-19 pandemic, more legal tech companies are likely jumping on the cloud bandwagon.
"What you will probably find working in the time of corona, more people will become more used to [working remotely] and more comfortable using it, it won't go away," said Hogan Lovells head of innovation and digital Stephen Allen. "The trend we have seen in the last three or four years of being cloud accessible will be nudged along the line more."
For legal tech companies, now could be the worst time to release an on-premise-only legal tech tool. Luckily, the expectation is many will go a different direction.
"Because of the coronavirus, they will all move online, and in legal tech if you are not able to provide a cloud-based solution with remote access … then lawyers simply aren't going to want to use them," said Allison Daly, marketing vice president of cloud-based legal tech platform LEAP Legal Software. "What good is a practice management system that you have to go in the office to use and you can't get to the office?"
LEAP is one legal tech provider that recently added cloud-based features in response to a growing need for remote access to combat the COVID-19 outbreak. Last week, the legal practice management platform announced users can purchase, train and install its cloud software remotely.
Daly said the new feature wasn't a client demand, but a business decision to allow law firms to run their business smoothly without risking their safety.
Still, although LEAP's latest features were inspired by the coronavirus, Daly said she doesn't think the development and adoption of cloud-based legal tech solutions will wane after the coronavirus outbreak ends.
"I think this has made it crystal clear that all industries need to have the ability to work remotely at any given time," she explained. "None of us could have seen this coming. It is an emergency situation, and because of that they have to have remote laptops and remote solutions for their law firm and business. After a crisis, people will know they will need this."
Developing cloud-based services is part of a larger push to provide the additional services people need, said Kimball Parker, president of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati's software developer subsidiary SixFifty.
Parker noted SixFifty's GDPR and CCPA compliance platforms were designed on the cloud to work in an evolving workforce, though not necessarily for working through a disaster. "We didn't anticipate a COVID pandemic, but we did anticipate people would want to access this from not just their desktop."
He added, "Just building this on premise wasn't an option. It cuts out a signification portion of the market."
Still, Nicole Black, lawyer and legal tech evangelist for case management platform MyCase, noted that it's not just legal tech companies without cloud platforms that may feel the need to change their technology during this outbreak.
While on-premise software companies will have to spend valuable time building a cloud infrastructure, cloud-based legal tech companies may have to develop tools to solve new obstacles faced by their clients, such as gaps in their cloud or remote services, she said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Many Legal Jobs Will be Affected by AI? Law Firms Can't Agree
Legal Tech Rundown: Opus 2 Opens Office in UAE, FTI Technology Announces Launch of Multiple AI Solutions and More
Joseph Saveri Law Firm, Co-Counsel File 9th Circuit Appeal in Lawsuit Targeting GitHub's Use of Code to Train AI Models
JAMS Launches Initiative to Leverage AI Technology in Dispute Resolution
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: Playing the Talent Game to Win
- 2GlaxoSmithKline Settles Most Zantac Lawsuits for $2.2B
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 5Partner Cuts: The Grim Reality of Post-Merger Integration
Who Got The Work
Eleanor M. Lackman of Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp has entered an appearance for Canon, the Japanese camera maker, and the Brooklyn Nets in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed Sept. 16 in California Central District Court by T-Rex Law on behalf of technology company Phinge Corporation, pursues claims against the defendants for their ongoing use of the 'Netaverse' mark. The suit contends that the defendants' use of the mark in connection with a virtual reality platform will likely create consumer confusion. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall, is 2:24-cv-07917, Phinge Corporation v. Yankees Entertainment and Sports Network, LLC et al.
Who Got The Work
Fox Rothschild partner Glenn S. Grindlinger has entered an appearance for Garage Management Company in a pending lawsuit over alleged wage-and-hour violations. The case was filed Aug. 31 in New York Southern District Court by the Abdul Hassan Law Group on behalf of a manual worker who contends that he was not properly compensated for overtime hours worked. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres, is 1:24-cv-06610, Bailey v. Garage Management Company LLC.
Who Got The Work
Veronica M. Keithley of Stoel Rives has entered an appearance for Husky Terminal and Stevedoring LLC in a pending environmental lawsuit. The suit, filed Aug. 12 in Washington Western District Court by Kampmeier & Knutsen on behalf of Communities for a Healthy Bay, seeks to declare that the defendant has violated the Clean Water Act by releasing stormwater discharges on Puget Sound and Commencement Bay. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Benjamin H. Settle, is 3:24-cv-05662, Communities for a Healthy Bay v. Husky Terminal and Stevedoring LLC.
Who Got The Work
Caroline Pignatelli of Cooley has entered an appearance for Cooley, partner Matt Hallinan, retired partner Michael Tu and a pair of Cooley associates in a pending fraud lawsuit related to the firm's representation of startup company Carbon IQ and founder Benjamin Cantey. The case, filed Sept. 26 in New Jersey District Court by the DalCortivo Law Offices on behalf of Gould Ventures and member Jason Gould, contends that the defendants deliberately or recklessly concealed critical information from the plaintiffs regarding fraud allegations against Cantey. Gould claims that he would not have accepted a position on Carbon IQ's board of directors or made a 2022 investment in the company if the fraud allegations had been disclosed. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Robert Kirsch, is 3:24-cv-09485, Gould Ventures, LLC et al v. Cooley, LLP et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom have stepped in to represent PDD Holdings, the operator of online marketplaces Pinduoduo and Temu, in a pending securities class action. The case, filed Sept. 30 in New York Eastern District Court by Labaton Keller Sucharow and VanOverbeke, Michaud & Timmony, contends that the defendants concealed information that rendered the growth of PDD unsustainable and posed substantial risks to PDD’s business, including merchant policies that made it unprofitable for vendors to do business on PDD platforms; malware issues on PDD applications; and PDD’s failure to implement effective compliance systems. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-06881, Macomb County Retiree Health Care Fund v. Pdd Holdings Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250