Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
64 results for '* judge:"District Judge Connolly"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2020-01-01
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Consumer Products | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Connolly
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Brian Farnan and Michael Farnan , Farnan LLP, Wilmington, DE; Jeffrey Bragalone, Jonathan Rastegar and T. William Ken-nedy, Bragalone Conroy P.C., Dallas, TX for plaintiff.
for defendant: Jack Blumenfeld and Jennifer Ying, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnel LLP, Wilmington, DE; Cory Davis, Theresa Weisenberger, Daniel Goettle and Jennifer Kurcz, Baker & Hostetler LLP, Atlanta, GA, Philadelphia, PA and Chicago, IL for defendant.
Case Number: D68827
Plaintiff failed to provide fair notice of how defendant's accused products directly infringed on plaintiff's patents, and because the court concluded plaintiff did not adequately allege direct infringement, it could not recover for induced infringement either.
Publication Date: 2019-12-25
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Pharmaceuticals
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Connolly
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jack B. Blumenfeld, Derek J. Fahnestock, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Errol B. Taylor, Fredrick, M. Zullow, Anna Brook, Jordan P. Markham, Kyanna Lewis, Nathaniel T. Browand and Venus Allahyarzadeh, Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP, New York, NY for plaintiffs.
for defendant: John C. Phillips, Jr. and David A. Bilson, Phillips, Goldman, McCaughlin & Hall, P.A., Wilmington, DE; George C. Lombardi, Michael K. Nutter, Ivan M. Poullaos, John R. McNair and Nimalka R. Wickramasek-era, Winston & Strawn LLP, Chicago, IL and Los Angeles, CA for defendant.
Case Number: D68820
The court properly excluded evidence relating to prior litigation which involved a different pharmaceutical.
Publication Date: 2019-12-11
Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Industry: Health Care | Manufacturing
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Connolly
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Karen L. Pascale and Pilar G. Kraman, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor LLP, Wilmington, DE; Matthew M. Wolf, Edward Han, Marc A. Cohn, Amy DeWitt, Krista M. Carter and Thomas T. Carmack, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, Washington DC and Palo Alto, CA for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Rodger D. Smith and Michael J. Flynn, Morris Nichols, Arsht & Tunnel LLP, Wilmington, DE; Bradford J. Badke, Ching-Lee Fukuda, Ketan V. Patel, Thomas A. Broughan III, Sharon Lee and Benjamin H. Huh, Sidley Austin LLP, New York, NY and Washington, DC for defendant.
Case Number: D68801
The court granted a motion to dismiss plaintiff's claim for tortious interference with contract and all but one of its patent in-fringement claims.
Publication Date: 2019-11-06
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Pharmaceuticals
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Connolly
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael P. Kelly, Daniel M. Silver, and Alexandra M. Joyce, McCarter & English, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Gary M. Rubman, Douglas A. Behrens, and Anna Q. Han, Covington & Burlington LLP, Washington, DC for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Frederick L. Cottrell, III, Jason J. Rawnsley, and Alexandra M. Ewing, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Shannon M. Bloodworth, Perkins Coie LLP, Washington, DC; David L. Anstaett and Emily J. Greb, Perkins Coie LLP, Madison, WI for defendants.
Case Number: D68758
Court transferred venue where one party was not a domicilary of the jurisdiction and there was no basis to impute venue from the resident co-defendant under a theory of successor-in-interest or agency, and factors weighed in favor of transfer of the entire litigation.
Publication Date: 2019-06-26
Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry: Food and Beverage
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Connolly
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Patrick C. Gallagher and Raeann Warner, Jacobs & Crumplar, P.A., Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.Patrick C. Gallagher and Raeann Warner, Jacobs & Crumplar, P.A., Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
for defendant: Richard A. Barkasy, Daniel M. Pereira, Jo Bennett and Samantha Banks, Schnader, Harrison, Segal & Lewis LLP, Wilming-ton, DE and Philadelphia, PA for defendant.
Case Number: D68609
In this employment discrimination case, plaintiff failed to establish the existence of a hostile work environment, so the court held defendant was entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: Shari L. Klevens, Alanna G. Clair
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2019-05-22
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Advertising | Electronics
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Connolly
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Stephen B. Brauerman and Sara E. Bussiere, Bayard, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Alfred R. Fabricant, Lawrence C. Drucker, Peter Lambrianakos, Vincent J. Rubino, III, Joseph M. Mercadante and Alessandra C. Messing, Brown Rudnick LLP, New York, NY for plaintiff.
for defendant: Jack B. Blumenfeld, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Brett Charhon, Martin C. Robson and Anthony M. Garza, Charhon Callahan Robson & Garza, PLLC, Dallas, TX for defendant.
Case Number: D68473
The court exercised its discretion to transfer this patent infringement action to a federal district court in another state for the convenience of the parties and witnesses, and because neither of the parties had their headquarters or operations in Delaware.
Publication Date: 2019-03-06
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Agriculture | Manufacturing
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Connolly
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Adam W. Poff and Pilar G. Kraman, Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor LLP, Wilmington, DE; Richard L. Rainey, Kevin B. Collins, R. Jason Fowler, Jay I. Alexander, Daniel E. Valencia, and Nicholas L. Envoy, Covington & Burling LLP, Washington, DC for plaintiff.
for defendant: Jack B. Blumenfeld, Jeremy A. Tigan, Anthony D. Raucci, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Michael J. Summersgill and Jordan L. Hirsch, Wilmer, Cutler, Pickering, Hale and Door LLP, Boston, MA; Mary V. Sooter, Wilmer, Cutler, Pickering, Hale and Door LLP, Denver, CO; Heath A. Brooks and Michael E. Wolin, Wilmer, Cutler, Pickering, Hale and Door LLP, Washington, DC for defendants.
Case Number: D68478
Claim of willful infringement sufficiently pled where alleged post-suit infringement meant that defendant would know or should have known of substantial risk of infringement.
Publication Date: 2019-01-23
Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry: Insurance
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Connolly
Attorneys: For plaintiff: N/A
for defendant: Geoffrey Graham, Grivner, Buchnan Ingersoll & Rooney P.C., Wilmington, DE for defendant.
Case Number: D68437
Where plaintiff amended her complaint to include federal claims, defendant had 30 days from the amendment to seek removal to federal court, and defendant's prior motion to dismiss did not constitute waiver.
Publication Date: 2019-01-16
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry: Financial Services and Banking | Distribution and Wholesale | Food and Beverage
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Connolly
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Whitney C. Cloud and Lesley F. Wolf, Assistant United States Attorneys, Wilmington, DE for the United States of America.
for defendant: Thomas E. Carluccio, Law Office of Thomas E. Carluccio, Plymouth Meeting, PA; Frank G. Fina, Law Office of Frank G. Fina, Plymouth Meeting, PA for defendant.
Case Number: D68429
The court denied a motion in limine where the evidence that the government sought to introduce was not intrinsic to the offenses charged in the indictment.
Publication Date: 2019-01-09
Practice Area: Discovery | Insurance Law
Industry: Insurance
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Connolly
Attorneys: For plaintiff: John S. Spadaro, John Sheehan Spadaro, LLC, Smyrna, DE for plaintiff;
for defendant: Michael R. Abbott, Cipriani & Werner, P.C., Wilmington, DE for defendant.
Case Number: D68414
Because courts could take additional evidence to support a removal notice's allegations with respect to the amount-in-controversy requirement, the court could grant a removing defendant's motion for leave to conduct discovery on the requirement to oppose plaintiff's motion to remand.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read