• CareDx, Inc. v. Natera, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2023-08-07
    Practice Area: Business Torts
    Industry: Health Care | Manufacturing
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Connolly
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Brian E. Farnan, Michael J. Farnan, Farnan LLP, Wilmington, DE; Edward R. Reines, Derek C. Walter, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, Redwood Shores, CA; Randi Singer, Elizabeth McLean, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, New York, NY for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Jack B. Blumenfeld, Derek J. Fahnestock, Anthony D. Raucci, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Kristin J. Achterhof, Julia L. Mazur, Martin S. Masar III, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Chicago, IL; Christina L. Costley, Paul S. Yong, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Los Angeles, CA; Bruce G. Vanyo, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, New York, NY; Timothy H. Gray, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Washington, DC for defendant.

    Case Number: 19-662-CFC

    Court granted defendant's judgment as a matter of law on the issue of Lanham Act damages where plaintiff presented no evidence that any customer was misled or relied upon defendant's advertisements found false by the jury.

  • In re FTX Trading Ltd.

    Publication Date: 2023-06-13
    Practice Area: Bankruptcy
    Industry: Financial Services and Banking | E-Commerce | Federal Government
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Connolly
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Ramona D. Elliot, P. Matthew Sutko, Frederick Gaston Hall, Sumi K. Sakata, Department of Justice, Executive Office for United States Trustees, Washington, DC; Andrew R. Vara, Joseph J. McMahon, Jr., Benjamin A. Hackman, Juliet M. Sarkessian, Department of Justice, Office of the United States Trustee, Wilmington, DE for appellant.
    for defendant: Adam G. Landis, Kimberly A. Brown, Matthew R. Pierce, Landis Rath & Cobb LLP, Wilmington, DE; Andrew G. Dietderich, James L. Bromley, Brian D. Glueckstein, Alexa J. Kranzley, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, New York, NY for appellees.

    Case Number: 22-11068 (JTD)

    District court was required to certify appeal of bankruptcy court order directly to the court of appeals where the order involved a purely question of law for which there was no controlling decision from the circuit court or Supreme Court.

  • Lamplight Licensing LLC v. ABB Inc.

    Publication Date: 2023-06-06
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Legal Services
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Connolly
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jimmy C. Chong, Chong Law Firm, PA, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Benjamin J. Schladweiler, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Andrew R. Sommer, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, McLean, VA for defendant.

    Case Number: 22-418-CFC

    Court possessed inherent authority to investigate plaintiff's possible efforts to defraud the court even after plaintiff voluntarily moved to dismiss its lawsuit.

  • Mellaconic IP LLC v. Timeclock Plus, LLC

    Publication Date: 2023-05-23
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Software
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Connolly
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Andrew S. Curfman, Howard Wemow, Sand, Sebolt & Wernow Co., LPA, Canton, OH for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Jimmy C. Chong, Chong Law Firm, PA, Wilmington, DE

    Case Number: 22-244-CFC

    Court possessed inherent authority to demand production of documents that might evidence potential fraud committed upon the court even though plaintiff had moved to voluntarily dismiss the case.

  • In re: Windhaven Top Ins. Holdings, LLC

    Publication Date: 2023-04-25
    Practice Area: Bankruptcy
    Industry: Consulting | Insurance
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Connolly
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Gregory L. Arbogast, Keith M. Lusby, Gebhardt & Smith LLP, Wilmington, DE for appellant.
    for defendant: Mark E. Felger, Barry M. Klayman, Gregory F. Fischer, Cozen O'Connor, Wilmington, DE for appellee.

    Case Number: 20-10524 (JTD)

    Bankruptcy court's jurisdiction to determine whether disputed funds were part of a debtor's estate did not "impair" the enforcement of state insurance laws and therefore did not trigger reverse preemption.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    New Jersey Estate Litigation 2014

    Authors: Michael R. Griffinger, Paul F. Cullum III

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Vanda Pharm., Inc. v. Teva Pharm. USA, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2023-01-10
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Pharmaceuticals
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Connolly
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Karen Jacobs, Derek J. Fahnestock, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Nicholas Groombridge, Eric Alan Stone, Josephine Young, Daniel J. Klein, Jennifer Rea Deneault, Michael F. Milea, Groombridge, Wu, Baughman & Stone LLP, New York, NY for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Karen E. Keller, Nathan R. Hoeschen, Shaw Keller LLP, Wilmington, DE; J.C. Rozendaal, Deirdre M. Wells, William H. Milliken, Sasha Rao, Michael Bruns, Byron L. Pickard, Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox PLLC, Washington, DC; Thomas J. Francella, Jr., Kaan Ekiner, Gregory F. Fischer, Cozen O’Connor, Wilmington, DE; Barry P. Golob, W. Blake Coblentz, Aaron S. Lukas, Kerry B. McTigue, Cozen O’Connor, Washington, DC; Keri L. Schaubert, Cozen O’Connor, New York, NY; Derek Gretkowski, Cozen O’Connor, Philadelphia, PA for defendants.

    Case Number: 18-651-CFC

    Defendants' ANDA did not result in liability for infringement of patent claims that the court found invalid as obvious based on the combined teachings of the prior art.

  • Arthrex, Inc v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, PA

    Publication Date: 2022-11-22
    Practice Area: Civil Procedure
    Industry: Health Care | Insurance
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Connolly
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Larry R. Wood, Jr., Adam V. Orlacchio, Anna Elizabeth Currier, James G. Gorman, III, Blank Rome LLP, Wilmington, DE; Justin F. Lavella, Alexander H. Berman, Blank Rome LLP, Washington, DC for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Kelly Elizabeth Rowe, Kurt M. Heyman, Aaron M. Nelson, Heyman Enerio Gattuso & Hirzel LLP, Wilmington, DE; Robert J. Katzenstein, Julie M. O'Dell, Smith, Katzenstein & Jenkins LLP, Wilmington, DE; Aaron S. Weiss, Daniel G. Enriquez, Steven J. Brodie, Carlton Fields, P.A., Miami, FL for defendant.

    Case Number: 22-00465-CFC

    Court transferred insurance dispute case to Florida where part of the underlying events occurred in Florida and plaintiff was headquartered there, giving Florida the greater interest in adjudicating the dispute.

  • Yogi Krupa, Inc. v. GLeS, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2022-11-22
    Practice Area: Contracts
    Industry: Energy | Retail
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Connolly
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Scott Thomas Earle, Randall Shaw MacTough, Zarwin Baum De Vito Kaplan Schaer Toddy P.C., Wilmington, DE; Stuart A. Schwager, Lerch, Early & Brewer, Chtd., Bethesda, MD for plaintiff.
    for defendant: William Edward Gamgort, Daniel Paul Johnson, Jennifer Marie Kinkus, Young, Conway, St Argatt & Taylor, Wilmington, DE; Ronald P. Golden, III, Bayard, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Karen T. Staib, Michael A. King, Shipman & Goodwin LLP, Hartford, CT for defendants.

    Case Number: 22-226-CFC

    Fuel station operator could not assert claims under the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act against the station property owner where franchisee had direct sublease and supply agreements with party that the owner had leased the property to, as there was no franchise relationship.

  • Eagle Pharm., Inc. v. Slayback Pharma LLC

    Publication Date: 2022-11-08
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Pharmaceuticals
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Connolly
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Daniel M. Silver, Alexandra M. Joyce, McCarter & English, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Daniel G. Brown, Rebecca Lynne Neubauer, Latham & Watkins LLP, Washington, DC; Kenneth G. Schuler, Marc N. Zubick, Alex Grabowski, Latham & Watkins LLP, Chicago, IL; Jennifer Koh, David F. Kowalski, Latham & Watkins LLP, San Diego, CA; Herman Yue, Latham & Watkins LLP, New York, NY for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Neal C. Belgam, Eve H. Ormerod, Smith, Katzenstein & Jenkins LLP, Wilmington, DE; Constance S. Huttner, Paul S. St. Marie, Jr., Roy H. Wepner, Beth C. Finkelstein, Jason A. Lief, Windels Marx Lane & Mittendorf LLP, Madison, NJ; Kenneth L. Dorsey, Cortlan S. Hitch, Morris James LLP, Wilmington, DE; Deepro R. Mukerjee, Lance A. Soderstrom, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, New York, NY; Jitendra Malik, Joseph M. Janusz, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Charlotte, NC; Christopher B. Ferenc, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Washington, DC; Rachel L. Schweers, Rachel J. Schaub, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Chicago, IL for defendants.

    Case Number: 21-1256-CFC-JLH

    New drug application did not infringe on patent describing "ready to use" pharmaceutical product where proposed products were not prepackaged and required substantial effort to prepare the drug for administration.

  • Bial-Portela & CA. S.A. v. Alkem Lab. Ltd

    Publication Date: 2022-10-04
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Pharmaceuticals
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Connolly
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Steven J. Balick, Andrew C. Mayo, Ashby & Geddes, Wilmington, DE; James B. Monroe, Jennifer H. Roscetti, Charles T. Collins-Chase, Lauren J. Dowty, Meredith H. Boerschlein, Ryan V. McDonnell, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Washington, DC; Jack B. Blumenfeld, Karen A. Jacobs, Jennifer Ying, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE for plaintiffs.
    for defendant: Benjamin J. Schladweiler, Samuel L. Moultrie, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Aaron F. Barkoff, Alejandro Menchaca, Rajendra A. Chiplunkar, Ben J. Mahon, Ashley M. Ratycz, McAndrews, Held & Malloy, LTD., Chicago, IL for defendant.

    Case Number: 18-304-CFC-CJB

    Court found for defendants in part in a case claiming patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. §271e(2)(A) for a new patent application for medication to treat partial-onset epileptic seizures.