Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
28 results for '* industry:"Mining and Resources"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2019-10-09
Practice Area: Bankruptcy
Industry: Energy | Mining and Resources
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Noreika
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Mark D. Collins and John H. Knight, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A, Wilmington, DE; Richard A. Levy, Keith A. Simon, and Christopher Harris, Latham & Watkins LLP, New York, NY for appellant.
for defendant: Seth Niederman, William H. Stassen, and Dana S. Katz, Fox Rothschild LLP, Wilmington, DE for appellees.
Case Number: D68728
Bankruptcy court did not abuse discretion to apply Bankruptcy Rule 7023 where it had grounds to find that all potential class members may not have been served with notice of the bar date, that certification would not adversely affect estate administration, and that the class claim would serve a deterrent effect upon the reorganized debtor.
Publication Date: 2019-09-04
Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory | Mining and Resources
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Laster
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Samuel T. Hirzel, II, Elizabeth A. DeFelice, Heyman Enerio Gattuso & Hirzel LLP, Wilmington, DE; Lawrence M. Rolnick, Steven M. Hecht, Jonathan M. Kass and Glenn McGillivray, Lowenstein Sandler LLP, New York, NY for petitioners.
for defendant: S. Mark Hurd and Lauren Neal Bennett, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; James R. Warnot, Jr., Adam S. Lurie, Brenda D. DiLuigi, Nicole E. Jerry and Elizabeth M. Raulston, Linklaters LLP, New York, NY for respondent.
Case Number: D68690
In this statutory appraisal proceeding, the court concluded that the deal price was the most persuasive indicator of fair value at the time of the merger.
Publication Date: 2019-07-03
Practice Area: Bankruptcy
Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory | Mining and Resources
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Noreika
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: D68619
Parties in this bankruptcy matter lacked standing to object to debtor's plan of reorganization.
Publication Date: 2019-01-30
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory | Mining and Resources
Court: Delaware Supreme Court
Judge: Justice Valihura
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Stephen C. Norman and Jaclyn C. Levy, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; David B. Hennes, C. Thomas Brown, Adam M. Harris and Elizabeth D. Johnston, Ropes & Gray LLP, New York, NY for plaintiffs Oxbow Carbon & Mineral Holdings, Ingraham Investments, William I. Koch and Oxbow Carbon Investment Co. LLC. Kenneth J. Nachbar, Thomas W. Briggs, Jr. and Richard Li, Morris, Nich-ols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; R. Robert Popeo, Michael S. Gardener and Breton Leo-ne-Quick, Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky & Popeo, P.C., Boston, MA for plaintiff
for defendant: Oxbow Carbon LLC. Kevin G. Abrams, Michael A. Barlow and April M. Kirby, Abrams & Bayliss LLP, Wilmington, DE; Brock E. Czeschin, Matthew D. Perri and Sarah A. Galetta, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Michael B. Carlinsky, Chad Johnson, Jennifer Barrett, Silpa Maruri, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, New York, NY; Christopher Landau, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sul-livan, LLP, Washington, DC for defendant Crestview-Oxbow Acquisition. J. Clayton Athey and John G. Day, Prickett, Jones & Elliott, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Dale C. Christensen, Jr and Michael B. Weitman, Seward & Kissell, LLP, New York, NY for defendant Load Line Capital
Case Number: D68441
The plain language of an LLC agreement governed the parties' dispute, and the trial court improperly implied a cove-nant where no contractual gap existed. Affirmed in part, reversed in part.
Publication Date: 2018-12-12
Practice Area: Corporate Governance | Insurance Law
Industry: Energy | Mining and Resources
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Wallace
Attorneys: For plaintiff: David J. Baldwin and Carla M. Jones, Potter Anderson & Corroon, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Seth B. Schafler and Seth D. Fiur, Proskauer Rose, LLP, New York, NY for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Seth A. Niederman, Fox Rothschild, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Joseph Collins, Fox Rothschild, LLP, Chicago, IL for defendant.
Case Number: D68383
Exclusionary clause of Directors & Officers insurance policy applied where claims against former directors would not have arisen but for their formation and use of investment vehicles, of which they were managers/members, to enrich themselves at the expense of the corporation for which they were directors and the corporation's creditors.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: Joseph S. Britton
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2018-05-23
Practice Area: Corporate Governance
Industry: Mining and Resources
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Glasscock
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Philip Trainer, Jr., Marie M. Degnan, Stanley S. Arkin, Robert C. Angelillo and Alex Reisen for plaintiff
for defendant: Gregory V. Varallo, Susan M. Hannigan, David L. Katsky, Adrienne B. Koch and Joseph Weiner for de-fendants Goggin and Goodwin; Michael Busenkell and Michael T. Leigh for defendant Collins.
Case Number: D68153
Where an operating agreement contained an exculpatory provision, plaintiff was entitled to proceed only on its breach of contract claim.
Publication Date: 2018-04-11
Practice Area: Bankruptcy
Industry: Mining and Resources
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge Jordan
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: D68106
The bankruptcy court acted properly in dismissing appellants claims as equitably moot, because the plan was substantially consummated and appellants did not timely seek a stay.
Publication Date: 2017-04-26
Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
Industry: Mining and Resources
Court: Delaware Supreme Court
Judge:
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: D67703
Royalty agreement with wholly-owned subsidiary of partner, when combined with termination fee provision in merger agreement with another subsidiary of partner, was not an unreasonable deal protectio
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read