Filter This View

  • Reid v. Siniscalchi

    Publication Date: 2018-02-21
    Practice Area: Business Torts | Contractual Disputes
    Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: Court of Chancery
    Judge: Vice Chancellor Slights
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: David W. deBruin, Thomas I. Sheridan, III and Derek Y. Brandt for plaintiff
    for defendant: Thomas A. Beck, Rachel E. Horn, Paul J. Vincenti and Elyse C. Pillitteri for defendants.
    Case Number: D68051

    Plaintiffs theory that defendants engaged in a conspiracy was a sham and the court did not have personal ju-risdiction over non-resident defendants.

  • TQ Delta, LLC v. 2Wire, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2018-02-21
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Brian E. Farnan, Michael J. Farnan, Peter J. McAndrews, Paul W. McAndrews and Rajendra A. Chiplunkar for plaintiff
    for defendant: Colm F. Connolly, Jody Barillare, Brett M. Schuman, Rachel M. Walsh and David L. Simson for defend-ant 2Wire, Inc.; Kenneth L. Dorsney, Paul M. Sykes, Melissa Hotze and Elizabeth J. Rader for defend-ants Adtran Inc. and Zyxel Communications Inc.
    Case Number: D68053

    In this claim construction matter, the court construed various terms relating to asynchronous transfer mode communications systems.

  • In re Dex Media, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2018-02-14
    Practice Area: Attorney Compensation
    Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: U.S. Bankruptcy Court
    Judge: Judge Gross
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: D68041

    Debtor was entitled to reasonable attorney fees to deter defendant from filing baseless copyright infringement actions.

  • Acceleration Bay, LLC v. Activision Blizzard, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2018-01-31
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Philip A. Rovner, Jonathan A. Choa, and Alan Silverstein, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Paul J. Andre, Lisa Kobialka, James R. Hannah, and Hannah Lee, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel, LLP, Menlo Park, CA; Aaron M. Frankel, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel, LLP, New York, NY, attorneys for plaintiff
    for defendant: Jack B. Blumenfeld and Stephen J. Kraftschik, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Michael A. Tomasulo, Gino Cheng, David K. Lin, and Joe S. Netikosol, Winston & Strawn LLP, Los Angeles, CA; Michael M. Murray, Winston & Strawn LLP, New York, NY; David P. Enzminger, Winston & Strawn, Menlo Park, CA; Dan K. Webb and Kathleen B. Barry, Winston & Strawn LLP, Chicago, IL; Thomas M. Dunham and Andrew R. Soomer, Winston & Strawn LLP, Washington, DC; Krista M. Enns, Winston & Strawn LLP, San Francisco, CA, attorneys for defendants.
    Case Number: D68022

    Patent term computer network included both multiple physical computers and multiple processes executing on a single computer, where intrinsic evidence demonstrated dependent claims which described computer network as involving processes on a single computer.

  • In re Simplexity, LLC

    Publication Date: 2018-01-24
    Practice Area: Bankruptcy | Creditors' and Debtors' Rights
    Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: U.S. Bankruptcy Court
    Judge: Judge Gross
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: D68017

    Bankruptcy court determined that creditor was entitled to new value defense as to one payment because it was permitted under the parties agreement and it benefitted the debtors, but not for another payment for which there remained genuine issues of material fact.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    New Jersey Employment Law 2024

    Authors: Rosemary Alito

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2018-01-03
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Entertainment and Leisure | Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Philip A. Rovner, Jonathan A. Choa, Paul J. Andre, Lisa Kobialka, James R. Hannah, Hannah Lee and Aaron M. Frankel for plaintiff
    for defendant: Jack B. Blumenfeld, Stephen J. Kraftschik, Michael A. Tomasulo, Gino Cheng, David K. Lin, Joe S. Netikosol, Michael M. Murray, David P. Enzminger, Dan K. Webb and Kathleen B. Barry for defendants.
    Case Number: D67993

    The court construed various terms in this patent litigation relating to computer technology.

  • Van Der Fluit v. Yates

    Publication Date: 2017-12-13
    Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
    Industry: Software | Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: Court of Chancery
    Judge: Vice Chancellor Montgomery-Reeves
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Peter B. Andrews, Craig J. Springer, and David M. Sborz, Andrews & Springer LLC, Wilmington, DE; Stuart A. Davidson and Christopher Martins, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, Boca Raton, FL; David T. Wissbroecker and Edward Gergosian, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, San Diego, CA, attorneys for plaintiff
    for defendant: Thomas A. Beck, Blake Rohrbacher, and Susan M. Hannigan, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE, attorneys for defendants.
    Case Number: D67968

    Although proxy failed to disclose identity of selling companys key negotiators, stockholders challenge to tender offer and merger transaction dismissed for failure to plead non-exculpated claims against co-founders and directors, where there was no evidence that majority of board and tendering stockholders were interested or non-independent.

  • Alex Is The Best, LLC v. Blu Prods., Inc.

    Publication Date: 2017-12-06
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Stephen B. Brauerman and Sara E. Bussiere, Bayard, P.A., Wilmington, DE, attorneys for plaintiff
    for defendant: Dennis J. Butler and John D. Simmons, Panitch Schwarze Belisaro & Nadel LLP, Wilmington, DE; Adam W. Poff and Robert M. Vrana, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor LLP, Wilmington, DE; Jack B. Blumenfeld and Stephen J. Kraftschik, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; John C. Phillips and David A. Bilson, Phillips Goldman McLaughlin & Hall, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Chad S.C. Stover, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Chicago, IL; Todd G. Vare and Jeffrey M. Barron, Barnes & Thornburg, LLP, Indianapolis, IN, attorneys for defendant.
    Case Number: D67958

    Court rejected plaintiffs assertion that patent claims of primary mode of communication and another available mode of communication had their plain meanings, adopting constructions that comported with the parties understanding that the claimed device had to designate a first mode of communication on start-up, and would use another mode when the primary one was unavailable.

  • Intl Bus. Mach. Corp. v. Groupon, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2017-11-29
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Stark
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: David E. Moore, Bindu A. Palapura, and Stephanie E. O'Byrne, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; John M. Desmarais, Jon T. Hohenthaner, Karim Z. Oussayef, Laurie N. Stempler, and Robert C. Harrits, Desmarais LLP, New York, NY, attorneys for plaintiff
    for defendant: John G. Day and Andrew C. Mayo, Ashby & Geddes, Wilmington, DE; J. David Hadden, Saina S. Shamilov, Phillip J. Haack, and Adam M. Lewin, Fenwick & West LLP, Mountain View, CA, attorneys for defendant.
    Case Number: D67952

    Patents-in-suit were not invalid due to being directed to patent-ineligible abstract ideas where the claims specifically described the architecture for improving the functionality of computer networks, rather than claiming data storage generally.

  • Sebastian v. Frickel

    Publication Date: 2017-11-29
    Practice Area: Bankruptcy
    Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
    Judge: Judge Vanaskie
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: D67953

    Where the parent corporation of plaintiffs employer did not assume contractual liability for plaintiffs employment, plaintiff lacked creditor standing to bring a derivative action. Dismissal affirmed.