Filter This View

  • Int'l Bus. Mach., Inc. v. Groupon, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2018-07-04
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Stark
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: David E. Moore, Bindu A. Palapura, Stephanie E. O'Byrne, John M. Desmarais, Karim Z. Oussayef, Lau-rie N. Stempler, Robert C. Harris, Brian D. Matty and Michael Matulewicz-Crowley for plaintiff
    for defendant: John G. Day, Andrew C. Mayo, J. David Hadden, Saina S. Shamilov, Phillip J. Haack and Sapna Mehta for defendant.
    Case Number: D68202

    In this patent dispute, genuine issues of material fact existed as to invalidity, obviousness and non-infringement issues, so the court denied summary judgment.

  • Kaavo, Inc. v. Amazon.com Inc.

    Publication Date: 2018-07-04
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Stark
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Stamatios Stamoulis, Richard C. Weinblatt, Sheekhar Vyas, James T. Bailey and Gregory Pollaro for plaintiff
    for defendant: Karen Jacobs, Megan E. Delliger, Alan M. Fisch, R. William Sigler, Jeffrey Saltman and Joseph Edell for defendants.
    Case Number: D68203

    Plaintiff's claims were not patent eligible because they were directed to an abstract idea and nothing in the claims represented an inventive concept.

  • Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. v. ABS Capital Partners, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2018-06-27
    Practice Area: Contracts | Intellectual Property
    Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory | Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: Court of Chancery
    Judge: Vice Chancellor Laster
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Philip A. Rovner, Jonathan A. Choa, and Alan R. Silverstein, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE, attorneys for plaintiff
    for defendant: Raymond J. DiCamillo, Chad M. Shandler, Matthew W. Murphy, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Steven F. Barley, Andrea W. Trento, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Baltimore, MD, attorneys for defendants.
    Case Number: D68190

    Misappropriation claim failed where only circumstantial evidence involved defendant's investment in competing business, an act it was permitted to do under the parties' agreements.

  • Certisign Holding, Inc. v. Kulikovsky

    Publication Date: 2018-06-20
    Practice Area: Corporate Governance
    Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: Court of Chancery
    Judge: Vice Chancellor Slights
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael A. Pittenger, Jaclyn C. Levy, Jay G. Stirling, and Tyson J. Prisbrey, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE, attorneys for plaintiff
    for defendant: David J. Margules, Elizabeth A. Sloan, and Suzanne O. Lufadeju, Ballard Spahr LLP, Wilmington, DE; William B. Igoe, Ballard Spahr LLP, Philadelphia, PA, attorneys for defendant.
    Case Number: D68182

    Directors' demand for transfer of stock ownership and repayment of personal loan in exchange for agreeing to ratify defective corporate acts constituted breach of fiduciary duty of loyalty.

  • Garrett v. Amazon.com, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2018-06-13
    Practice Area: Labor Law
    Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: Delaware Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Slights
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Portia Garrett, pro se appellant
    for defendant: John J. Ellis, Heckler & Frabizzio, Wilmington, DE, attorney for appellee.
    Case Number: D68176

    Industrial Accident Board was not obligated to strictly follow evidentiary rules and therefore did not err in denying workers' compensation claim, in part based on hearsay evidence.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Texas Legal Malpractice & Lawyer Discipline 2023

    Authors: Charles F. Herring, JR, Jason M. Panzer, Leah Turner

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Cavi v. Evolving Sys. NC, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2018-06-06
    Practice Area: Contracts | Employment Litigation
    Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Sean A. Meluney and Alan L. Frank for plaintiff
    for defendant: Herbert W. Mondros, Diane M. Coffey, Paul N. Silverstein and Brian M. Clark for defendants.
    Case Number: D68169

    Plaintiff alleged sufficient facts to support his tort and quasi-contract claims, but he was not entitled to recover for breach of good faith and fair dealing.

  • In re JMO Wind Down, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2018-05-02
    Practice Area: Bankruptcy
    Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory | Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: U.S. Bankruptcy Court
    Judge: Judge Shannon
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael R. Nestor, Peter M. Gihuly and Andrew R. Gray for Jumio Acquisition; Adam G. Landis, Shanti M. Katona and George W. Shuster, Jr. for debtors and liquidating trustee
    for defendant: Matthew B. Heimann, Charles A. Stanziale, Jr. Steven A. Beckelman, Jeffrey T. Testa and Kate Roggio Buck for Bloso Investments; Leo D. Plotkin, Andrew John Roth-Moore, Christopher C. Cooke, Michael G. Busenkell, Bryan L. Bates, Charles E. Dorkey, III, Thomas F. Driscoll, III, Ian C. Bifferato, Kimberly Gattuso, Todd Charles Schiltz, Michael L. Bernstein, William P. Bowden and “J” Jackson Shrum for remaining parties.
    Case Number: D68121

    Bankruptcy court determined that a partys state court claims were derivative rather than direct claims, and therefore they belonged to the liquidating trustee.

  • DecisivEdge, LLC v. VNU Grp., LLC

    Publication Date: 2018-04-04
    Practice Area: Contracts
    Industry: Consulting | Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: Delaware Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Carpenter
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: John G. Harris and Sean A. Meluney, Berger Harris LLP, Wilmington, DE, attorneys for plaintiff
    for defendant: Beth Moskow-Schnoll, Evan W. Krick, and William J. Burton, Ballard Spahr LLP, Wilmington, DE, attorneys for defendant.
    Case Number: D68095

    Claim for early termination fee not dismissed where reasonableness of estimation of difficult-to-ascertain damages continued to be genuine issue of material fact.

  • In re Appraisal of AOL Inc.

    Publication Date: 2018-03-07
    Practice Area: Corporate Governance | Mergers and Acquisitions
    Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: Court of Chancery
    Judge: Vice Chancellor Glasscock
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Stuart M. Grant, Mary S. Thomas and Laina M Herbert for petitioners
    for defendant: Kevin R. Shannon, Berton W. Ashman, Jr., Christopher N. Kelly, William Savitt, Ryan A. McLeod, An-drew J.H. Cheung, Nicholas Walter and Courtney L. Shike for respondent.
    Case Number: D68067

    In this statutory appraisal proceeding filed by a minority stockholders following a merger, the court relied on a discounted cash flow analysis to determine share value.

  • D&M Holdings, Inc. v. Sonos, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2018-03-07
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jack B. Blumenfeld, Michael J. Flynn, John M. Jackson, Matthew C. Acosta, Blake T. Dietrich, Chris-topher J. Rourk, Robert P. Latham, David Folsom and Wasif Qureshi for plaintiffs
    for defendant: Philip A. Rovner, Jonathan A. Choa, George I. Lee, Sean M. Sullivan, Rory P. Shea, J. Dan Smith, Mi-chael P. Boyea, Cole B. Richter and Jae Y. Park for defendant.
    Case Number: D68065

    In this patent litigation matter, the court engaged in claim construction in connection with issues arising in defendants motions for summary judgment.