0 results for 'null'
Lawyers Anticipating the New Normal Call Post-Boundary Life 'a Gift and a Curse'
"Because most people are working remotely, the sheer volume of emails has probably tripled," Crystal West Edwards said. "When someone used to be able to pop by the office ... [that] is now a two-page email."Former FBI Special Agent in Charge Rejoins Cole, Scott & Kissane
After a two-decade career with the FBI that culminated with him leading the Bureau's fifth-largest field office, Robert Lasky has returned to Cole, Scott & Kissane.Former Miami FBI Special Agent in Charge Rejoins Cole, Scott & Kissane
After a two-decade career with the FBI that culminated with him leading the Bureau's fifth-largest field office, Robert Lasky has returned to Cole, Scott & Kissane.Risks and Liabilities Relating to the Emergence of Decentralized Clinical Trials
The COVID-19 pandemic created an environment to drive the exponential growth of alternatives to traditional, site-based clinical trials such as remote/decentralized trials.View more book results for the query "*"
PLW People in the News—May 11, 2021—Marshall Dennehey, Long and Long
Michael A. Sebastian joined Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin's Scranton regional office as a shareholder in the workers' compensation department, and Nicole M. Pardus, associate attorney at Long and Long in Greensburg, was elected vice chair of the Westmoreland Bar Association young lawyers division.While the World Was on Lockdown, NJ Law Firm Javerbaum Wurgaft Grew Its Business
"The relationships that we develop with lawyers, on both sides of the aisle, cannot be nurtured via Zoom," said managing shareholder Eric Kahn.Has 'COVID Time' Legislation Worked, and What Does It Mean for NJ's Criminal Justice Reform Future?
Roughly 3,675 individuals have been released from prison as of March 31, 2021, under S-2519, according to the New Jersey Department of Corrections.Tortious Interference Case Highlights Statute of Limitations Challenge
In 'S.A.R.L. Galerie Enrico Navarra v. Marlborough Gallery', the First Department agreed with the Supreme Court that plaintiff's claims for tortious interference with contract and aiding and abetting tortious interference with contract had not expired as a matter of law, because all of the elements of the claims had materialized before the statute of limitations had run its course.