Connecticut Law Tribune | Best Practices
By Emily Cousins | February 15, 2023
"You need to do whatever it takes to make that argument," Andrew Ranks of Connecticut Trial Firm said.
Daily Business Review | Analysis
By Lisa Willis | February 15, 2023
"Of late, I think the worst thing that has happened with lawyer ethics is that we have merged issues of professionalism into ethics," said Brian Tannebaum, attorney and ethics expert.
New Jersey Law Journal | Analysis
By Charles Toutant | February 14, 2023
"It's a good idea to think about how your advocacy could backfire," said Melissa Gomez, president of MMG Jury Consulting.
Daily Report Online | News|Profile
By Cedra Mayfield | February 14, 2023
"No matter the platform, these trial tactics work every time," said trial attorney William B. Hill Jr. of Seyfarth Shaw in Atlanta.
By Andrew Goudsward | October 31, 2022
The select committee's success at using pre-recorded clips of witness interviews to present its findings has attorneys bracing for a wider use of video depositions on Capitol Hill.
By Zack Needles | Alaina Lancaster | August 27, 2021
This recent episode of Legal Speak is your chance to get some pointers on legal writing from a sitting judge without worrying about having your motion tossed out.
By Raychel Lean | August 12, 2021
If you're not familiar with session replay software, privacy lawyers suggest it's time to read up.
By Zack Needles | Karen Sloan | June 25, 2021
This week's episode is your chance to get some pointers on legal writing from a sitting judge without worrying about having your motion tossed out. Am Law Litigation Daily editor and columnist Ross Todd chats with 10th Circuit Judge Robert E. Bacharach, author of the recent book, "Legal Writing: A Judge's Perspective on the Science and Rhetoric of the Written Word." The book examines legal writing through the lens of psycholinguistics, a branch of cognitive science focused on how the brain processes language and speech.
By Raychel Lean | June 23, 2021
"If you are using an analogy that is meant to simply contextualize, put meat on the bones for the jury, to help them understand and contextualize not only the factual issues but the impact upon the parties on either side, then that's where it's appropriate," one South Florida trial attorney said.
By Cedra Mayfield | May 20, 2021
"Your adrenaline's running, you're in the trial zone and you don't necessarily think before you speak, and you say the wrong thing," said appellate attorney Elissa Haynes in Atlanta. "That wrong thing is oftentimes what a juror latches on to, and it results in these outrageous verdicts."
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
McCarter & English, LLP, a well established and growing law firm, is actively seeking a talented and driven associate having 2-5 years o...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS