“We cannot overlook a legal error like this just because both parties agreed to it,” the Florida Supreme Court ruled.
March 21, 2024 at 03:51 PM
4 minute read
Florida Supreme Court justices clashed Thursday in a ruling in which they rejected a disciplinary stipulation. They remanded the case involving a county judge, because the stipulation was based in part on a legally incorrect reading of the Code of Judicial Conduct.
“We cannot overlook a legal error like this just because both parties agreed to it,” the state Supreme Court majority ruled.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
Florida Supreme Court Justices. From left: Carlos Muñiz, Charles Canady, Jorge Labarga, John Couriel, Jamie Grosshans, Renatha Francis. (Courtesy photos)
