Miami-Dade Circuit Chief Judge Issues New Rules for Remote Proceedings
Miami-Dade Circuit Chief Judge Bertila Soto issued new emergency procedures on the use of electronic devices while in a remote courtroom.
April 07, 2020 at 02:28 PM
4 minute read
It is a new world, with remote telephonic hearings now the norm.
And Miami-Dade Circuit Chief Judge Bertila Soto issued new emergency procedures on the use of electronic devices while in a remote courtroom. Lawyers and others who do not comply could face punishment by the court.
Administrative Order No. 20-07 specifies that in remote court cases connected by communication equipment, lawyers, the press and the public cannot use electronic devices without the approval of the presiding judge in the case. The devices include smartphones, cameras, computers, laptops and digital voice recorders. The limitation on the use of these devices applies to using them to make photography, videography and audio recordings.
The order provides that lawyers, the public and the press can use electronic devices, such as cellphones, for sending and receiving written information, like emails and text messages. However, these devices must be either be silent, in vibrate mode, or turned off. Also, while laptops or tablets with regular keyboards are allowed, they must not make noise. In fact, if the electronic device becomes disruptive, the presiding judge can revoke the privilege of the person using it.
"Since we are operating under social distancing requirements issued by the CDC to reduce the likelihood of transmitting COVID-19 among persons, our members of the press can no longer just walk into a courtroom to cover an in-person public court proceeding," Soto said. "In the virtual world, a little more planning is needed."
Soto said the new administrative order is meant to ensure that lawyers, the public and the press can continue accessing virtual court proceedings. It gives clear instructions on how to request access.
That includes news gathers who do not meet the definition of professional journalists, and members of the public who want to access remote hearings. They must contact the court to access a remote hearing at least one business day in advance of the hearing.
The new order by Soto also updates Administrative Order No. 14-02, which took effect in January 2014 and laid out the governing use of electronic devices in court proceedings.
These rules come as the court prefers that "mission critical court matters" and nonessential hearings take place remotely through communication equipment, unless the judge on the case says an in-person court hearing is necessary.
Previously, there was a suspension of having nonessential hearings occur through the use of communication equipment. This changed March 31 with Administrative Order 20-05, as the Miami-Dade courts by necessity became more proficient using Zoom video conferencing technology.
Chief judge offers 3 tips for lawyers
Soto advises lawyers who will go before any Miami Dade Circuit judge to check the website of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida and its social media, @miamidadecourts, for updates on the use of communications equipment and participation in remote hearings.
Second, the court advises lawyers and litigants to be patient.
"We will be with them," Soto said. "All of us are moving as quickly as possible to learn new technology and get it ready to roll out for regular use in our busy circuit in the near future."
Soto said the court is committed to provide justice to the community while protecting the health of the public, judges and court staff.
Third, lawyers should continue to check the presiding judge's web page.
Soto said in an email, "Depending on the division, there may be specific instructions for remote court proceedings."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFlorida Law Firms Brace for Category 5 Hurricane Milton
These Florida Courts Are Closing Amid Category 4 Hurricane Milton
$25M Award: Jury Finds Hospital Negligent After Patient Raped
The 'Biden Effect' on Senior Attorneys: Should I Stay or Should I Go?
9 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250