Sales Agent or Chinese Translator? Decision Stands on Commissions for $20M Sale of Miami Condos
More than $1 million in real estate broker commissions should go to a Chinese investors' brokerage in the 16-unit sale of One Paraiso condos, an appellate court rules.
August 09, 2018 at 12:42 PM
5 minute read
The Third District Court of Appeal has upheld a lower court siding with a real estate agent accused of selling high-end condominium units in Miami's Edgewater neighborhood behind her former boss's back and cutting him out of commissions.
Miami Real Estate Invest LLC hired Beini Xu as an independent contractor to network with prospective Chinese buyers of Miami real estate and help with sales, according to their agreement.
Miami Real Estate Invest, led by David Landau, sued Xu and New York-based American Da Tang Group, which was created to help Chinese buyers with U.S. real estate deals, and affiliate American Da Tang Realty Inc.
In an Aug. 5, 2015, complaint, Landau alleged the defendants conspired to cut him out of the $20 million purchase of 16 units in One Paraiso and argued he was owed the $1 million brokers' commissions from the deal.
One Paraiso is a 53-story, 276-unit condo tower in The Related Group's luxury four-tower development on Biscayne Bay along Northeast 31st Street east of Biscayne Boulevard. The other towers are the 388-unit Paraiso Bayviews, 368-unit Paraiso Bay and the 317-unit Gran Paraiso.
Miami Real Estate Invest also sued affiliates of The Related Group and its broker, Fortune International Realty. They were later dropped in exchange for holding the commissions in escrow until the case ended.
Both Miami Real Estate Invest and American Da Tang Realty are claiming the money, according to court records.
Miami Real Estate Invest has argued in court filings it's the one owed the commissions because it initially showed the Paraiso project to American Da Tang CEO Shan-Jie Li and made introductions to a Fortune Realtor and a Related Group official.
Li first reached out to Xu in October 2013 seeking help with buying Miami real estate. Xu was an agent with Miami Real Estate Invest and quit in January 2015. Landau helped Li close on two units in Paraiso Bay. This transaction isn't in dispute since the commissions were split among Miami Real Estate Invest, American Da Tang Realty and Xu, according to the complaint.
When it came to the 16-unit deal, Xu testified at trial last year that she didn't work as a real estate agent. Rather, she was a Mandarin translator and an assistant to Li and the units' buyer, China City Construction Co., according to the Miami-Dade Circuit Court final judgment.
Li hired Xu as his assistant and regional manager for his American Da Tang Longevity Club, according to court filings. The Longevity Club offers health and wellness packages in Miami to wealthy Chinese, according to its website.
Xu testified she translated for Longevity Club clients and Li in real estate and other dealings and helped with other business affairs, like scheduling entertainment and appointments, and her work on the condo deal was part of her employment with Li, not Miami Real Estate Invest.
Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Jose Rodriguez agreed.
He also ruled against Miami Real Estate Invest on another point, concluding the brokerage didn't prove it was the procuring cause for the One Paraiso sales.
Disputes over broker commissions often focus on credit for procuring the deal.
The Third DCA panel comprised of Judges Thomas Logue, Kevin Emas and Vance Salter on July 5 unanimously affirmed the lower court in a one-page opinion.
Landau said this doesn't end his case and cited a motion for rehearing en banc filed July 19. He declined further comment.
His attorney, Simon, Schindler & Sandberg partner Roger Schindler in Miami, didn't respond to a request for comment. The motion again argued Miami Real Estate Invest was the procuring cause and Xu was the agent in the deal.
“Miami Real Estate Invest earned its commission as the procuring cause of sale by introducing the representative of CCCC (China City Construction Co.), Shan-Jie Li, to the Paraiso Bay project generally and to the One Paraiso condominium specifically,” Schindler wrote.
Schindler said Landau introduced Li to the project and Fortune International's Realtor-associate Carmen Casadella and Related's condo division head Carlos Rosso. This supports the claim Landau was the procuring cause for the 16-unit deal, Schindler wrote.
Lydecker Diaz partner Joan Carlos Wizel in Miami, who together with managing partner Mark Hendricks represents all of the defendants, asked the appellate court to deny the motion for rehearing.
The Third DCA decision was a win for his clients as well as the Miami real estate market, he said.
If the case went the other way and credited Landau, it would have put a chill on Li and others like him who bring Chinese real estate buyers to Miami.
“The Chinese market has to be opened through relationships. They are very culturally based and very culturally guided companies, so you basically need someone who knows the culture who is willing to invest the time to develop relationships with Chinese investors to bring them over and create that interest in the real estate market here in Miami,” Wizel said.
A reversal would deter Li “from continuing to bring investors into the Miami real estate market and maybe focus elsewhere.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Much Coverage Do You Really Have? Valuation and Loss Settlement Provisions in Commercial Property Policies
10 minute readThe Importance of 'Speaking Up' Regarding Lease Renewal Deadlines for Commercial Tenants and Landlords
6 minute readMeet the Attorneys—and Little Known Law—Behind $20M Miami Dispute
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250