0 results for 'null'
'A Lot of Love for Trump': Is Miami a Favorable Venue for the Ex-President's Trial?
"The elephant in the room is that we haven't generated a witness list yet," Special Counsel Jack Smith said in arguing bond conditions before US Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman in Miami.Berkeley Law Seeks to Help Legal Professionals Impacted by Layoffs
By offering this support, Berkeley Law Executive Education hopes not only to "mitigate the disruption caused by job loss, but also to foster a vibrant, interconnected community of lifelong learners, ready to adapt to and shape the future of the legal profession," Adam Sterling said in a statement.'T.H. v. M.B.,' Judiciary Law §753(3) and Child Support, Caveat Counsel
A Manhattan Supreme Court justice's recent ruling is dangerous because it can mislead members of the bar who rely on published decisions as gospel, as they often go unaddressed and uncorrected, a Law Journal columnist writes.When an Expense is Considered 'Paid': 'Gage v. Commissioner'
A discussion of the recent Tax Court case, Gage v. Commissioner, which addressed (1) the year in which a payment in settlement of claims made against the taxpayers by the federal government was considered to have been made for tax purposes, and (2) whether it was reasonable for the taxpayers to believe that the payment was not a "fine or similar penalty" nondeductible under IRC section 162(f).The Gallo Exemption: What It Is and Why You Should Know About It
While the scope of the Gallo exemption is narrow, some of those trusts to which it applies are still in existence. The practitioner should realize that certain modifications of a Gallo exempt trust, including, for example, modifications via a decanting or court proceeding, could inadvertently trigger a GST tax.View more book results for the query "*"
'Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith': A Myopic View of Fair 'Use'
We summarize key elements of the majority's reasoning, highlighting some of the analytical conundrums and open questions it leaves behind.Judge in the Hot Seat: JQC Moves to Block Effort to Dismiss Ethics Charges
The defense argued that because "the clear meaning of 'habitual intemperance' is repeated public intoxication not spoken words," the judge's conduct failed to amount to habitual intemperance.Connecticut Supreme Court Decision Brings Back Memories
Langston described well the Huey Court's discussion of the breadth of information that a judge may consider during sentencing as a matter of due process.European Commission May Require Google to Sell Off Ad-Tech Business
This is the fourth antitrust investigation antitrust chief Margrethe Vestager has opened into a Google service.A Complete Guide to Today's Care Crisis
Brought to you by Trustmark Voluntary Benefits
Download Now
2024 ESI Risk Management & Litigation Readiness Report
Brought to you by Pagefreezer
Download Now
How the Workplace Works: CRE Leadership Forum Takeaways
Brought to you by HqO
Download Now
State AI Legislation Is on the Move in 2024
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now