By Michael Marciano | February 26, 2024
A check-in with an attorney who has kept watch over Connecticut's "case of the century."
By Paul Shechtman | January 26, 2024
In November of 2023, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in United States v. Diaz, which raises a question about the admissibility of expert law enforcement testimony offered to support the prosecution's theory that the defendant knew she was transporting drugs. In his article, Yale Law Professor Paul Schechtman discusses the case and its potential implications.
By Ellen Bardash | October 31, 2023
The update to Rule 702, set to go into effect officially on Dec. 1, has raised the issue of whether it's a long overdue way to hold judges to an evidentiary standard they should have been following for decades or if it encourages them to cross over into the jurors' domain.
By Amanda Bronstad | Ross Todd | Ellen Bardash | October 19, 2023
At a Sept. 6 status hearing, lawyers on both sides of the talcum powder lawsuits against Johnson & Johnson debated the impact of the upcoming amendments to Federal Rule 702 of Evidence.
By Abigail Adcox | August 2, 2023
Many in the legal community, from Big Law partners to retired judges, underscored the gravity of Trump's latest indictment.
By Emily Saul | April 26, 2023
The order would bar Trump from sharing any materials to news or social media organizations, that he be allowed to review certain documents only in the presence of counsel, and that certain material be kept in the "exclusive control" of his attorneys.
By Emily Saul | November 22, 2022
"For my clients, they will be here. All of them," Alina Habba told Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Arthur Engoron during a preliminary conference to set the civil case's motion schedule.
By Andrew Goudsward | October 31, 2022
The select committee's success at using pre-recorded clips of witness interviews to present its findings has attorneys bracing for a wider use of video depositions on Capitol Hill.
By Andrew Goudsward | October 21, 2022
The lawyer, Justin Clark, undermined Bannon's claims of executive privilege in an interview with federal investigators.
By Andrew Goudsward | October 10, 2022
Durham's personal intervention in the case comes after a jury delivered a swift rebuke to the special counsel's investigation following the trial of former Perkins Coie partner Michael Sussmann.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New England Legal Awards serves as a testament to the outstanding contributions and achievements made by legal professionals.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
We are seeking an associate to join our Employee Benefits practice. Candidates should have three to six years of employee benefits experienc...
Associate attorney position at NJ Immigration Law firm: Leschak & Associates, LLC, based in Freehold, NJ, is looking for a full time ass...
Duane Morris LLP has an immediate opening for a senior level, highly motivated litigation associate to join its dynamic and growing Employme...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS