The 1966 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Arizona v. Miranda established a person's right to be silent when questioned by police, and to have an attorney present. But the issue isn't always clear cut and every so often Connecticut appellate courts field legal challenges claiming Miranda violations.
February 28, 2014 at 12:07 AM
1 minute read
The 1966 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Arizona v. Miranda established a person’s right to be silent when questioned by police, and to have an attorney present. But the issue isn’t always clear cut and every so often Connecticut appellate courts field legal challenges claiming Miranda violations.
Most often, the decision turns on whether the person being questioned by police believed they were in the custody of police, or not, when they made incriminating statements.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New England Legal Awards serves as a testament to the outstanding contributions and achievements made by legal professionals.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
