Get Ready, Defense Attorneys: States Are Ramping Up Enforcement Against Price Gougers
Attorneys general are putting retailers on notice about potential lawsuits.
April 22, 2020 at 12:36 PM
3 minute read
Connecticut Attorney General William Tong. Photo: Michael Marciano/ALM
Defense attorneys are likely to see an influx of new business in the coming weeks and months, as prosecutors target businesses accused of taking advantage of public fears by artificially escalating prices on COVID-19-related supplies.
"A lot of attorneys will be very busy defending retailers and people who are price gouging, no doubt," said Connecticut lawyer Mark Dubois, of Geragthy & Bonnano in New London. "The attorney general and his counterparts have some pretty strong tools in the consumer protection area, and they have the ability to conduct civil investigations that can be quite far-reaching."
Attorneys general across the country are mobilizing.
In Florida, businesses have returned more than $240,000 to consumers, who overpaid during the COVID-19 outbreak, according to news reports.
"We are responding in real-time to complaints of price gouging and scams, making sure we are getting price adjustments … getting refunds for Floridians," Attorney General Ashley Moody said in a statement. "We are also making sure we are furthering those investigations by issuing preservation letters and subpoenas. So that work will continue."
Meanwhile, Connecticut Attorney General William Tong said his office had received 558 complaints concerning 313 retailers in the state. His staff has sent letters of inquiry to 255 of these businesses, which include online and brick-and-mortar stores.
In one instance, a retailer allegedly charged $33.47 for a 12 ounce, two-pack of Purell hand sanitizer, a 261% increase over the price about two months earlier in January. Another business allegedly charged $555 for a 40-pack of 3M N95 masks, representing a more than fivefold price increase.
Tong's office is considering, on a case-by-case basis, whether to file suit against those retailers.
"The state has subpoena power and investigatory powers and those can be quite intrusive," said Wiggin and Dana attorney Robert Langer, who specializes in antitrust law.
3M-Related Actions
But are there any possible defenses for price gouging?
"I suppose there could be a whatever-the-market-can-bear defense," Dubois said Wednesday. "While you might have technical legal defenses, these cases end up being tried in the court of public opinion. People do not look kindly on those accused of price gouging."
Meanwhile, Tong's office issued a release announcing it had joined 20 other attorneys general urging The 3M Co. to take further measures to prevent price gouging of personal protective equipment.
The attorneys general are asking the company to take several actions, including creating a database of 3M's inventory of N95 respirators for government officials and health care providers, and to make transparent how inventory is being distributed, and how orders are being filed.
In addition to Connecticut, participating states include California, Delaware, New York and Pennsylvania.
And earlier in April, Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives, according to Politico, introduced legislation that would ban online sellers from exploiting loopholes in price-gouging policies. That legislation is pending.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All!['Every Single Judge on Board': First-Impression Case Revived 'Every Single Judge on Board': First-Impression Case Revived](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/0b/41/f5f135fa43fcb601f8685883b507/intracervical-insemination-sperm-767x633.jpg)
![Apple Disputes 'Efforts to Manufacture' Imaging Sensor Claims Against iPhone 15 Technology Apple Disputes 'Efforts to Manufacture' Imaging Sensor Claims Against iPhone 15 Technology](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/412/2020/09/Apple-computer-sign-Article-202009041221.jpg)
Apple Disputes 'Efforts to Manufacture' Imaging Sensor Claims Against iPhone 15 Technology
Trending Stories
- 1How Cohen Seglias Started With a Construction Practice and Turned It Into a Full-Service Law Firm
- 2Blank Rome Snags Two Labor and Employment Partners From Stevens & Lee
- 3'I Was Deeply Offended': A Judge's Introspection
- 4Insurance Coverage for Emerging Supply Chain Risks in Latin America
- 5Building an Ownership Mindset as a Gen Z Junior Associate
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250