Should Law Schools Do More to Develop Business-Ready Attorneys?
Indiana University Maurer School of Law professor William Henderson takes a different approach to the idea of associate training.
March 03, 2020 at 05:00 AM
3 minute read
Editor's note: This piece is a companion to a report on the changes law firms have made to their associate training programs over the past decade.
While many law firms are bulking up their professional development offerings to better prepare associates earlier in their careers, some experts point out that it's even more cost-effective for law schools to bear the brunt of the training.
This is the idea behind the "T-shaped lawyer," a theory developed by Indiana University Maurer School of Law professor William Henderson. In his mind, attorneys need to not only have the deep legal expertise learned in law school (the long, vertical part of the letter T), but also professional, business and technology skills (the shorter, horizontal part of the T) to be coveted by many Am Law 200 firms.
"The T-shaped lawyer is important because they can do work that is not highly specialized, such as data processing, business operations principles—these lawyers are good at formulating solutions that deal with a client's needs for less," he says. "Many Am Law 200 firms want this type of attorney."
Henderson explains that after the Great Recession, clients started handling more of this type of general work in-house. But since it can be good on-the-job training for early-career associates, firms want it back. And by helping newer attorneys develop the business and professional skills needed to do this work well, firms can earn it back.
Henderson has also looked at ways to better train future associates before they even set foot in a law firm. In 2018, he founded the Institute for the Future of Law Practice, a nonprofit partnering law schools, law firms and corporate legal departments to better prepare law students.
As a law student becomes an associate and advances through their career, they become increasingly difficult and expensive to train, Henderson says. The nonprofit aims to shift more of that training back to a student's time at law school to keep costs down and improve efficiency.
Even though law firms are making strides, Henderson says, it doesn't all have to fall at their feet.
"There's better-quality training going on, including communication skills, empathy and putting yourself in the shoes of your clients," Henderson says. "But I wish some of this could have been done at law school."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHighest-Earning Partners May Be Looking to Cash In on Early Retirement
5 minute readLinklaters Duo Jumps to Reed Smith's Structured Finance Practice
Law Firms Are In a Strong Spot, But Their Continued 'Growth Mindset' Comes With Challenges
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Justices Will Weigh Constitutionality of Law Allowing Terror Victims to Sue PLO
- 2Nevada Supreme Court to Decide Fate of Groundbreaking Contingency Cap Ballot Measure
- 3OpenAI Tells Court It Will Seek to Consolidate Copyright Suits Under MDL
- 44th Circuit Allows State Felon Voting Ban Challenge to Go Forward
- 5Class Actions Claim Progressive Undervalues Totaled Cars
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250