Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
(L to R) Joshua Wong, Nathan Law, and Alex Chow, Hong Kong protest leaders.

A dozen barristers and judges, including Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher London partner Charlie Falconer, QC, penned an open letter on Sunday criticizing a Hong Kong court’s decision to send three student activists to prison for unlawful assembly.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

Law Firms Mentioned

[caption id="attachment_523" align="alignnone" width="535"]<img class="wp-image-523 size-full" src="http://www.almcms.com/contrib

    /uploads/sites/396/2017/10/Hong-Kong-Protest-Leaders-Article-201710161744.jpg" width="535" height="372" /> <i>(L to R) Joshua Wong, Nathan Law, and Alex Chow, Hong Kong protest leaders.</i>[/caption] A dozen barristers and judges, including��Gibson, Dunn &amp; Crutcher London partner��Charlie Falconer, QC, penned <a href="https://www.hongkongfp.com/2017/10/16/in-full-top-intl-lawyers-condemn-hong-kongs-jailing-of-democracy-activists-as-a-serious-threat-to-the-rule-of-law/" target="_blank">an open letter</a> on Sunday criticizing a Hong Kong courts decision to <a href="http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/politics/article/2107216/occupy-activists-joshua-wong-and-nathan-law-jailed-hong-kong" target="_blank">send three student activists to prison</a> for��unlawful assembly. In August, Joshua Wong, Alex Chow and Nathan Law were sentenced by the Court of Appeal to six-, seven- and eight-month prison terms respectively for their involvement in the Occupy Central pro-democracy protests in 2014. ���As lawyers, we regard the imprisonment of Joshua Wong, Alex Chow and Nathan Law in Hong Kong as a serious threat to the rule of law,��� the open letter says. In addition to Falconer, former��Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice of the U.K. under��Prime Minister Tony Blair, the open letter was also signed by 11 international human rights lawyers, including��former United Nations chief war prosecutor��Desmond Lorenz de Silva, QC,��Kirsty Brimelow QC, chair of the Bar Human Rights Committee of England and Wales, Sir Geoffrey Nice QC, former chief prosecutor in the trial of Slobodan Milo��evi��, and U.S. lawyer��Jared Genser, attorney for the late Chinese dissident and Nobel Peace Prize��laureate Liu Xiaobo and his widow Liu Xia. The August decision came��after the Hong Kong Department of Justice appealed a lighter sentence of community service handed down previously by a lower court. The Court of Appeal decision was��subsequently��<a href="http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/politics/article/2108919/court-finally-releases-english-version-judgment-jailed-hong" target="_blank">criticized by members of the legal community and by the press</a>��for potential breach of the so-called "double jeopardy" principle, which protects defendants from��facing criminal prosecution more than once for the same offense. The open letter also criticizes the Hong Kong��<a href="https://www.hongkongfp.com/2017/10/16/in-full-top-intl-lawyers-condemn-hong-kongs-jailing-of-democracy-activists-as-a-serious-threat-to-the-rule-of-law/" target="_blank">Public Order Ordinance</a>���the law used to send the Occupy Central activists to prison. "The Public Order Ordinance is incompatible with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), which applies to Hong Kong. Human rights organizations have long urged Hong Kong to revise the ordinance to comply with the ICCPR," the��letter says. Born out of the 1967 riots against British colonel rule, the Public Order Ordinance was most recently amended in 1997, on the eve of the hand over of Hong Kongs sovereignty from Britain to China. The 1997 amendment, which required protest organizers to obtain government approval, has been controversial, as it allowed the government to��restrict��citizens<a href="http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/article/1078885/protesters-say-public-order-ordinance-restricts-their-rights" target="_blank">��right to publicly assemble</a>. The open letter also accuses the Chinese government for its role in eroding the independence of the judiciary in Hong Kong. "The independence of the judiciary, a pillar of Hong Kong, risks becoming a charade, at the beck and call of the Chinese Communist Party," the letter states, referring to a 2014 government <a href="http://www.international.law.com/id=1202661355875" target="_blank">white paper issued</a> by Beijing stating that the central government has comprehensive jurisdiction over Hong Kong. In August, responding to rising concern about Hong Kongs judicial independence coming under threat after the Court of Appeal decision, the Hong Kong��Bar Association and the Law Society of Hong Kong released a <a href="http://www.hkba.org/sites/default/files/20170818%20-%20Joint%20Statement%20of%20HKBA%20and%20LSHK%20in%20Response%20to%20Criticisms%20of%20Judicial%20Independence%20in%20HK%20%28E%29.pdf" target="_blank">joint statement</a>. "The decisions by the Hong Kong courts are made solely according to law upon applications by one party or the other. We see no indication otherwise in respect of the recent cases which have generated widespread comment," read the statement, referring to the jailing of the student leaders. "Unfounded comments that judicial decisions were made or influenced by political considerations originating outside Hong Kong are unjustified and damaging to our legal system, and to Hong Kong as a whole," the statement said. <

      > Knitter: Too few entities/relations are generated compared to number of concepts (only 98% (79/80) concepts are converted).

      Grand Jury PracticeBook

      Grand Jury Practice is the most comprehensive treatise available on how grand juries function. Thorough and pragmatic, it brings together statutory and case law, Justic...

      Get More Information

      Think Globally

      How does your firm compare against firms around the globe? Evaluating a potential global alliance? Find critical information on the Global 200 law firms in Legal Compass - compare financials, track laterals, and more.

      Get More Information

      Commercial Litigation & Arbitration Forum 2020Event

      For senior dispute resolution professionals to network and engage through open debate, panels, expert speakers & breakout sessions

      Get More Information

      The Asia Legal Awards 2020Event

      Where the region's top lawyers, law firms and in-house teams will gather to celebrate their most stellar achievements of the year.

      Get More Information

      ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

      Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

      As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

      Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.