The plaintiff argued in a post-trial motion that the court’s entry and application of global orders regarding evidence in Philadelphia’s Roundup trials resulted in the jury receiving a skewed picture of scientific research on the Monsanto-produced weedkiller.
March 19, 2024 at 12:34 PM
4 minute read
Litigation Reporter
The original version of this story was published on The Legal Intelligencer
The only plaintiff so far to lose a Philadelphia Roundup trial claims a bar on key evidence fueled the defense verdict.
Plaintiff Carl Kline argued in a post-trial motion filed March 15 that the court’s entry and application of global orders regarding evidence in Philadelphia’s Roundup trials resulted in the jury receiving a skewed picture of scientific research on the Monsanto-produced weedkiller.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
Credit: ZikG/Shutterstock.com
