Decreasing Deal Work Impacts Many Practices: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
July 11, 2022 at 06:00 AM
5 minute read
Legal Practice Management
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
EVERYBODY HURTS - A rising tide lifts all boats, but a falling tide leaves everybody high and dry. As M&A practices in Big Law take a breather this year, other law firm groups are slowing down too, Law.com's Patrick Smith reports. Areas such as tax, employee benefits and executive compensation, antitrust and other ancillary practices are all feeling the effects. That generally means fewer billed hours in these ancillary practices; less resources budgeted for the groups for the rest of the year; more time these lawyers spend in seminars, conferences and other non-billable activities; and fewer lawyers hired in the groups, according to law firm leaders and recruiters. Three Am Law 100 firm leaders, who declined to be named, said the effects of a corporate slowdown are already being felt. "Corporate is off, tax is off, they are all off," one leader said. "That is typical [when corporate is down]. And from what I hear from other firms, they are off as well. Everything that ties into deal x work is off." The law firm leader said this was expected, and the firm budgeted 100 fewer hours per corporate attorney this year compared with last and put some reserves in their budget for this year. "Corporate activity is definitely having an impact [on other practices]," said the firm leader.
START YOUR ENGINES - If a dearth of deal work has slowed your practice down, maybe it's time to shift gears. As digital transformation hits the transportation industry, Big Law attorneys are racing to the intersection of automation and the automotive sector, Law.com's Jessie Yount reports. Though driverless technology remains nascent and few states have adopted legal frameworks to test vehicles on the road, lawyers are optimistic that advancements in technology, coupled with more understanding from regulators, will fuel demand for legal expertise. "We're at an inflection point now where we'll see more [state] frameworks around use and commercial operations of vehicles and rules of the road," said Peter Stockburger, the co-leader of Dentons' autonomous vehicles practice. "That is where there are challenges and opportunities." Likewise, Baker & Hostetler "is eager to serve emerging technology companies and industries, which are the future," said Melody Drummond Hansen, who was the leader of O'Melveny & Myers' automated and connected vehicles industry group prior to her move to Baker & Hostetler last month. And amid rapid advancements in artificial intelligence, sensors, chips and data storage, the autonomous vehicles sector is set to "be transformative," she said. "I see it as the internet boom and the industrial revolution combined," Drummond Hansen said.
ON THE RADAR - Meta Platforms, the parent company of Facebook and other social media platforms, was hit with a false advertising class action Friday in Illinois Southern District Court. The lawsuit accuses Meta of understating the amount of false and duplicate social media accounts on its platforms while overstating the amount of monthly active users in order to sell more digital advertising. The complaint was brought by Goldenberg Heller & Antognoli and Margulis Gelfand LLC on behalf of website and mobile apps that compete with Facebook for ad spend. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendant. The case is 3:22-cv-01455, Metroplex Communications Inc. v. Meta Platforms Inc. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
'This Has Never Happened': M&A Leaders on Why Making A Deal With a Fellow Black Woman Was a Watershed Moment By Alaina Lancaster and Zack Needles |
How To Make It: How to Build Internal Business Development and Leverage Opportunities By Tasha Norman |
Creating 'a Compelling Precedent,' 11th Circ. Rules Title VII's Anti-Retaliation Provision Protects All Employees, Including Managers By Mason Lawlor |
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Business Mindset': McGuireWoods' Jeffrey Connor on His New Role as COO
5 minute readSupreme Court Attorney Deepak Gupta Wants More Competition in Plaintiffs Bar
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250