Remote Work Raising Concerns Over Retention, Burnout and Morale; Can Law Firms Move the Needle On Diversity Through Mergers?; Another Tech Company Sued Over Lack of Diversity: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
September 24, 2020 at 06:00 AM
5 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
TROUBLE ON THE HOME FRONT – There's no denying the pandemic has forced some positive and much-needed changes on many law firms, including improved efficiency and collaboration. But let's not start giving each other socially distanced air high fives just yet: As Andrew Maloney reports, a study by staffing firm Robert Half has found that, despite the pros of remote work, concerns have emerged this year over retention, burnout and morale. The report, released this month, was based on polling 2,800 U.S. senior managers in multiple industries, including law firms and in-house law departments, in July and August. While its findings weren't only specific to the legal industry, Jamy Sullivan, executive director for Robert Half Legal, said they align with trends they've seen for lawyers. "When you think of morale and the legal field over the last couple of years, we've seen burnout has increased," Sullivan said. "That has just been heightened due to the pandemic."
TOGETHER FOR THE BETTER – Waiting for law firms to make meaningful progress on diversity can feel painfully slow. But what if it doesn't have to? As Patrick Smith reports, legal consultants are starting to get behind the notion that more large firms should be exploring mergers with women- and minority-owned boutiques, rather than trying to recruit diverse lawyers from the same handful of Ivy League schools year after year. In theory, it can be a win-win for both sides. "All these Am Law 200 firms want diversity, and firms love groups," said Merle Vaughn, managing director and national law firm diversity practice leader at legal recruiting giant Major, Lindsey & Africa. And the smaller firms on the other side of these combinations, she noted, "no longer have to deal with as many administrative issues" and will get the benefit of more marketing dollars and larger practice platforms. There are some downsides, however: "Smaller firms could be giving up what they were trying to do in the first place," Vaughn said. "You are giving up that independence, and you could give up the culture you created that was so important to the diverse attorneys that work there."
DERIVATIVE ACTION OVER DIVERSITY INACTION – Cisco Systems is the latest Silicon Valley tech giant to face a shareholder derivative action aimed at the company's diversity record. The lawsuit, filed Wednesday in California Northern District Court by Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd and AsherKelly, calls on Cisco to replace three current board members with racial minorities. The suit also demands that Cisco invest in social justice programs, educational opportunities and recruiting efforts to benefit African Americans. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendants. Read the full complaints and stay up to date on major litigation nationwide with Law.com's Legal Radar.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
Ginsburg's Clerks, Colleagues and Family Honor Her at the Supreme Court By Marcia Coyle
Manhattan Judge Orders Eric Trump to Testify in NY AG's Investigation Before Election By Jane Wester
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Likely to Keep Up Antitrust Enforcement, but Dial Back the Antagonism
5 minute readAs Tech-Focused Roles in C-Suite Expand, Newcomers Embrace Big Law Opportunities
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250