A Houston law firm Tuesday lost its bid to force an ex-client to arbitrate a dispute over a 35% contingent fee contract, which the client alleged he was tricked into signing during a meeting at a McDonald’s restaurant.

The Fifth Court of Appeals in Dallas ruled that Daspit Law Firm’s arbitration agreement “is procedurally unconscionable.” It affirmed a trial court’s order that refused to send the case to arbitration.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]