Davis Wright Tremaine Has a Plan to Reopen Hollywood
Many firms have set up dedicated COVID-19 advisory groups as firms look to establish clear branding in uncertain times. But few have tailored the group to a specific industry as Davis Wright has.
May 13, 2020 at 05:35 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
As millions of Americans have turned to television and movies for diversion and comfort amid the coronavirus pandemic and resulting business shutdowns, the companies that create that content are left scratching their heads about how to resume business safely when they are allowed. Davis Wright Tremaine has launched a new group in hopes of providing the answers.
The West Coast-based Am Law 100 firm has put together an interdisciplinary team whose express purpose is to facilitate the reopening of the Hollywood entertainment industry, one of several such law firm advisory groups spawned in the era of the novel coronavirus pandemic.
Since mid-March, California has, like many states, been under a strict shelter-in-place order—Hollywood production teams and studios included. But the state is slowly beginning to reopen under a deliberate, four-phase plan that began May 8.
Given the new movement to reopen, Davis Wright had decided to lean on its media and entertainment reputation, putting together a team that will advise clients as the state looks to reopen. The firm has represented numerous media companies including Comedy Central, A24, HBO and Amazon Studios.
The group is composed of attorneys from Davis Wright's labor and employment, health care and entertainment practices and is co-led by entertainment partners Jon Segal and Al Wickers.
Many firms have set up dedicated COVID-19 advisory groups as they look to establish clear branding in uncertain times. But few have tailored the group to a specific industry, as Davis Wright has. Segal said there are few California firms that can offer high-quality counsel not just in media, but in other practices as well.
"We started putting this together two weeks ago as we saw the reopening of production on the horizon," Segal said. "Other firms don't have the capability of dedicated attorneys in health care and labor as well as entertainment."
As for Hollywood's future, the picture is bleak. Media and entertainment were not included in the current stage of reopening, phase two, and California Gov. Gavin Newsom has not set a date for when entertainment companies can resume production. And in Los Angeles County, local officials said Tuesday that the area's stay-at-home order will likely continue through July.
Still, the sector is a regional Goliath. The Los Angeles entertainment industry alone employs 220,860 people, with about 150,370 employed in the motion picture and sound recording industries.
And while many companies have found workarounds for preproduction by, for example, creating virtual writers' rooms, in-person production poses the same challenges facing many restaurants and retailers, the group said.
Like in restaurants, in studios it is inherently difficult to follow social distancing guidelines that require people to stay six feet apart, the attorneys said. Additionally, companies will have to negotiate with powerful unions and established detailed disinfection and employee training protocols.
With little industry-specific guidance from the state so far, the attorneys are planning for various scenarios and contingencies. Will county-by-county ordinances encourage production companies to shoot in a more relaxed county? If a company sets up a production in another state, will they have to follow California regulations?
"There are many considerations," said entertainment partner Elizabeth Zee, another member of the working group. "It won't be a one-size-fits-all solution. It will vary production by production."
Reality television shows and documentaries, for example, don't require the large crews and onerous equipment that a movie production demands. The firm has already gotten several requests from clients looking to send out their correspondents after nearly two months of shut down. Zee anticipates other changes as well.
"No more crowd scenes," Zee said. "I also suspect there will be a lot more CGI and green screens."
But for now, the group is in a wait-and-see mindset as federal, state and local governments weigh new, and often varying, guidelines.
"We want to be in a position where, when reopening happens, we're ready to go," Segal said.
|Read More
Buoyed by Young Partners, Davis Wright Tremaine Posts Near-Double-Digit Revenue Gain
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSteptoe Offers Associates New Flexible Billable Hour Tracks in Revamped Comp System
4 minute readNevada Supreme Court to Decide Fate of Groundbreaking Contingency Cap Ballot Measure
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250