Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Davis Wright Tremaine'

You can use to get even better search results
February 29, 2024 | Legaltech News

Tracking Generative AI: How Evolving AI Models Are Impacting Legal

A running compilation of how the legal landscape continues to be shaped by generative AI tools, from GPT technologies to art generation tools and beyond.
146 minute read
February 28, 2024 | The American Lawyer

Holland & Hart Posts 22% PEP Bump Thanks to Strong Demand, Cost Management

Colorado's biggest law firm also increased gross revenue by 11.3% in 2023 as all major practice areas saw growth.
5 minute read
February 22, 2024 | Law.com

Legal Forges Ahead With DE&I Efforts, Despite Backlash

While DE&I rhetoric may not be as prominent as it was in 2020, efforts to address gender and racial disparities in the legal industry are not only ongoing, but also expanding and maturing.
9 minute read
Variscite NY Four LLC v. N.Y.S. Cannabis Control Board
Publication Date: 2024-02-14
Practice Area: Administrative Law | Constitutional Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York, U.S. - NDNY
Judge: District Judge Anne M. Nardacci
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Attorney for Plaintiffs: Jeffrey M. Jensen, Esq., Pro Hac Vice, of counsel, Jeffrey M. Jensen, Beverly Hills, CA. Attorneys for Plaintiffs: Thomas J. Higgs, Esq., of counsel, E. Stewart Jones Hacker Murphy, LLP, Troy, NY.
For defendant: Attorney for Defendants: Ryan W. Hickey, Esq., Assistant Attorney General, of counsel, Hon. Letitia James, New York State Attorney General, The Capitol, Albany, NY.
Case number: 1:23-CV--01599

Barring Issuance of Adult Cannabis Licenses Would Not Serve Public Interest

Roe v. St. John's University
Publication Date: 2024-02-09
Practice Area: Civil Rights
Industry: Education
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Judge: Circuit Judge Robert D. Sack
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant: Michael Valentine, on the brief, The Law Office of Michael Valentine, Brooklyn, NY, Peter G. Eikenberry, Law Office of Peter G. Eikenberry, New York, NY.
For defendant: For Defendant-Appellee: Michael J. Goettig, on the brief, Lyle S. Zuckerman, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, New York, NY. For Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellee: Victoria L. Stork, on the brief, Baker & Hostetler LLP, New York, NY, Chardaie C. Charlemagne, Baker & Hostetler LLP, San Francisco, CA.
Case number: 21-1125

Inference of Sex Discrimination in University's Disciplinary Proceedings Not Raised

Law Journal Press | Digital Book All About Cable and Broadband Authors: James C. Goodale, Rob Frieden View this Book

View more book results for the query "Davis Wright Tremaine"

February 08, 2024 | New York Law Journal

Attorneys 'On the Move': Hinshaw Adds Financial Services Litigator; SEC Enforcement Attorney Joins Davis Wright

And other announcements of recent hirings and promotions of New York attorneys.
4 minute read
February 06, 2024 | Texas Lawyer

Small Firms Best Netflix Legal Team, High Court Denies Review in Libel Case

The case concerns the Netflix series "Dirty Money" and one episode titled "Guardians Inc." that documented abuses perpetrated against vulnerable elderly citizens.
3 minute read
February 06, 2024 | The American Lawyer

Alston & Bird Partner Heads to Lowenstein as New Data Privacy Chair

Amy Mushahwar has also spent time at Holland & Knight, Reed Smith, Ballard Spahr and Davis Wright Tremaine.
4 minute read
February 05, 2024 | National Law Journal

Lowenstein Hires New Data Privacy Chair From Alston & Bird

Amy Mushahwar has also spent time at Holland & Knight, Reed Smith, Ballard Spahr and Davis Wright Tremaine.
4 minute read
Gibson-Wright v. Smith
Publication Date: 2024-02-02
Practice Area: Civil Appeals
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: Georgia Court of Appeals
Judge: Presiding Judge Miller
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Tyler Conklin, (Conklin Law Firm), Atlanta, William Kelbaugh, (The Kelbaugh Firm LLC), Atlanta, for appellant.
For defendant: John O’Brien, William Diehl, (Thompson, O’Brien, Kappler & Nasuti, PC), Peachtree Corners, Norcross, Rudolph Smith, Alapaha, for appellee.
Case number: A23A1540

Court reverses grant of a protective order against a city council member because the evidence did not support that order, and remands for reconsideration of a claim for attorney fees

TRENDING STORIES

    More from ALM

    More from ALM

    Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

    Resources

    • Top 10 Compliance Concerns for Private Fund Managers

      Brought to you by Ontra

      Download Now

    • The Top 10 Terms in Private Equity NDAs

      Brought to you by Ontra

      Download Now

    • THE LEGAL HOLD PLAYBOOK: A guide to implementing self-service legal hold

      Brought to you by DISCO

      Download Now

    • 2024 Ethics & Compliance Program Effectiveness Report for North America

      Brought to you by LRN

      Download Now