In Tuesday’s historic arguments over President Donald Trump’s fight against subpoenas for his financial records, the U.S. Supreme Court justices struggled to find a balance between their worries about potential harassment of presidents and interference with their duties and concerns over how a ruling for the White House could elevate presidents above the law and impede legitimate oversight and investigations.

The court’s conservative majority seemed more sympathetic than their liberal colleagues to Trump’s challenge to subpoenas by three House investigating committees, but there appeared to be openness across the bench to the needs of a state grand jury investigating possible criminal activity by Trump and his businesses.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]