Ropes & Gray Vet Moves On After IP Boutique's Quick Demise
The name partners of short-lived McCaulley Dowell have amicably taken separate paths.
November 26, 2019 at 04:40 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
The writing was on the wall only a year after Richard McCaulley and Anthony Dowell started their boutique intellectual property firm in Chicago.
McCaulley Dowell is no more, a little more than a year after the IP boutique launched. The firm's website is offline and its two name partners have taken jobs with other firms located thousands of miles apart.
But both McCaulley, who has joined the IP boutique firm Haley Guiliano in San Jose, California, and Dowell, an attorney/of counsel at Gutwein Law in Lafayette, Indiana, said there's no bitterness or bad feelings about the venture. Both men said they are happy where they are now, and the two Notre Dame Law School classmates remain good friends.
Joining Haley Guiliano is a homecoming of sorts for McCaulley. The firm is a spinoff of Ropes & Gray's IP practice, which McCaulley previously chaired before he left to create his boutique with Dowell. As a result, McCaulley has a lot of friends at the firm who have welcomed him with open arms.
"These are close colleagues of mine," McCaulley said. "Still going to have the same practice, still going to have the same clients, the same vision, but leveraging the people they have. They have a lot of technical advisers and associates who are wonderful for my matters. That was really the motivating factor."
McCaulley Dowell was profitable and had a couple of associates and a chief financial officer, Dowell said. But the firm was never able to make enough money to justify hiring more associates, which made it difficult to take on more cases representing plaintiffs in patent-protection cases,
"We didn't take off as fast as we would like and didn't get the business we were hoping for," Dowell said. "I needed to look for other types of litigation to do and landed at Gutwein."
It became a vicious cycle of sorts: The firm's small size made it difficult for them to take on bigger cases, which in turn made it harder for them to attract talent.
"Clients want to see a bigger team," McCaulley said. "It's hard as a small staff to keep the best talent. That was really the main reason for hooking up with my mates at Haley Guiliano."
Years of changes in federal law aimed at stymieing so-called patent trolls and adverse court decisions have made it harder for plaintiffs to pursue cases against companies that have allegedly ripped off their IP, largely due to greater procedural hurdles, like forcing plaintiffs to file patent cases in the federal district where the defendants are located, Dowell said.
"That has become a dying business," Dowell said. "It's been very difficult with some Supreme Court rulings and changes to federal law in 2012."
Dowell said patent enforcement litigation is still being waged, but it's a "fraction of what it was five or 10 years ago."
In August, Gutwein Law's only other litigator left that firm, so Dowell jumped at the chance to run the 15-person firm's litigation department. Dowell said he has a long relationship with Stuart and Andrew Gutwein, the namesakes of his new firm.
The move to Lafayette was natural for Dowell; he ran his own law firm, Dowell Baker, for 10 years before moving to Chicago in 2014. In the Windy City, Dowell was briefly an of counsel at Taft Stettinius & Hollister and a partner at then-Niro, McAndrews, Dowell & Grossman—a spinoff created by the son of prolific patent plaintiffs lawyer Raymond Niro—before he created his own firm, Dowell IP, in May 2015.
"It's been fun," Dowell said about his new firm. "I'm in court a lot. … It's a great firm. It's growing fast. We have a growing office in Indianapolis and one in Minneapolis, all of it creating a lot of litigation that seems to go along with any type of business, on occasion. I've been fortunate to step in at the right time and take over that book of litigation they have."
McCaulley said it was always his plan to move west, regardless of the firm he called home. He hasn't made that move to San Jose yet. McCaulley is still working out of the firm's West Loop office in Chicago, preparing to take the California bar exam next year.
|Read More
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAs Tech-Focused Roles in C-Suite Expand, Newcomers Embrace Big Law Opportunities
What About the Old Partners Who Have No Interest in AI?
Avantia CEO Discuss Blurring Lines Between Law Firm, Software Provider and ALSP
8 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250