Ex-DLA Piper Partner Denies Assault Claims, Blasts Accuser for 'Exploiting' #MeToo
"This isn't victim-blaming or victim-shaming. She's not a victim here," Louis Lehot said of partner Vanina Guerrero.
October 21, 2019 at 01:01 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Louis Lehot, the former DLA Piper partner who was dismissed from the firm earlier this month after being accused of sexual assault by partner Vanina Guerrero, is now accusing Guerrero of "exploiting the #metoo movement to cover up her own issues."
On Monday, Lehot made his first public statement since the accusations against him surfaced. He denied Guerrero's claims and provided more than 40 pages of purported emails between the two lawyers showing friendly exchanges during the period of time in which Guerrero has alleged she was assaulted repeatedly.
In an open letter published earlier this month, Guerrero accused Lehot of sexually assaulting her multiple times in the months after he recruited her to join the firm. She also called on DLA Piper to release her from her mandatory arbitration agreement with the firm.
Lehot was fired from the firm several days later.
But less than a week after Lehot was pushed out, DLA Piper announced that it had placed Guerrero on administrative leave. The firm said that while investigating her claims against Lehot, it had found that another person had accused Guerrero of inappropriate behavior.
"It's good to see the truth is beginning to come out. I did not assault or harass Vanina Guerrero and she knows it," Lehot said in his statement.
"I acknowledge poor judgment in developing an emotional relationship with Vanina Guerrero. I deeply regret the pain this has caused my family, colleagues, clients and friends," Lehot continued. "This isn't victim-blaming or victim-shaming. She's not a victim here."
According to Lehot, he agreed to leave the firm earlier this month because he acknowledged that he should not have developed an emotional relationship with the junior partner. He said he fully cooperated with DLA Piper's investigation, and alleged that Guerrero refused to cooperate.
Lehot made reference to numerous emails between himself and Guerrero, around the times of the alleged assaults, in which they coordinated travel arrangements and Guerrero requested a seat next to him on flights. The emails also showed discussion of personal matters, like an exchange of advice on which bedsheets Lehot should buy.
Reached for comment Monday, Wigdor LLP partner Jeanne Christensen, who represents Guerrero, said, "By this, Louis Lehot is saying he's OK with litigating in open court and no secret arbitration."
Spokespeople for DLA Piper, reached Monday, referred to the firm's previous statements on the matter.
Dan Packel contributed to this report.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAs Tech-Focused Roles in C-Suite Expand, Newcomers Embrace Big Law Opportunities
What About the Old Partners Who Have No Interest in AI?
Avantia CEO Discuss Blurring Lines Between Law Firm, Software Provider and ALSP
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250