Mayer Brown Partner to Chambers: Include More Women or Leave Me Out
Will more men follow Chris Arnold's lead and ask to be removed from Chambers & Partners over the gender imbalance in its rankings?
October 16, 2019 at 10:02 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
After his LinkedIn post calling out legal rankings giant Chambers & Partners for the dearth of women in its rankings went viral, a Mayer Brown partner went one step further this week, asking to be removed from the company's listings—and urging other men in his practice area to do the same.
In an open letter, Chris Arnold, a London partner in Mayer Brown's derivatives and structured products practice, asked to be removed from Chambers' 2020 U.K. derivatives rankings because only one woman made the list out of 18 lawyers recognized. In Chambers' global derivatives rankings from this year, only two of the 27 ranked lawyers are women.
In the letter, which was published to his LinkedIn page on Monday and addressed to top Chambers editors, Arnold called on the company to remove his name from the ranking until the list was updated so that women comprise 25% of the list or at least four more women attorneys.
"This is completely unrepresentative of the extraordinary female talent in this sector," Arnold wrote of the current rankings. "One of the root causes of inequality in the legal sector is lack of diverse role models. Third party recognition is a critical element impacting a lawyer's perceived success. Chambers is failing to support role models by not recognising more female and diverse lawyers in its rankings."
"I invite the 16 other brilliant male 'Ranked Lawyers' below to join me," he wrote in his post accompanying the letter. As of Wednesday morning, none of the men from the group whom he tagged in the post had publicly answered the call.
Chambers did not provide a statement directly addressing Arnold's letter when asked for comment, but on Wednesday the company placed a statement on its website highlighting initiatives it has taken or will take to increase diversity and inclusion. Additionally, Dee Sekar, head of diversity and inclusion at the firm, responded to Arnold's post with an invitation to continue the conversation.
"We really are doing a lot in terms of inclusion at Chambers and I'd be happy to let you/your network know about them," she wrote. "As a corporate lawyer myself … I personally understand the importance of inclusion in the legal profession and Chambers, as a business, is doing everything we can to ensure we are an inclusive organisation that helps further the advancement of inclusion across the profession globally."
Arnold's salvos have been widely shared on LinkedIn, with more than 1,000 reactions and nearly 50 comments on his open letter post. Among them are messages from associates and attorneys thanking Arnold for his gesture, sharing their experiences in the legal industry and offering advice to Chamber for how it could be more inclusive of women and minorities.
"Back in the day—when I worked at Chambers & Partners—we didn't realise the bias of peer review. 20+ years later it's important that this issue is resolved and I applaud you for the stand you are taking," wrote one recruiter.
A partner at a firm in Brazil noted that many smaller firms that were headed by women did not receive recognition from Chambers, although the market recognized them: "Just wanted to add that in Brazil for instance, only the biggest law firms are awarded by the Chambers Diversity and Inclusion, while the smaller law firms, usually led by women, are doing a lot more representative work for inclusion in the law field, which are being recognized by the market!"
A fintech parter at Baker McKenzie added that, among the many steps Chambers could take to improve, law firms themselves should continue to improve diversity efforts, and Chambers should take into account who is actually doing the work at a firm: "You could focus on updating rankings so that the more senior men in the sector who do not actively practice any more and are simply heads of team / managing partners and have been in lists for years are removed to make way for actively practicing lawyers."
Arnold declined to comment for this story. In addition to asking his Chambers-ranked male U.K. derivatives colleagues to consider joining his boycott, his LinkedIn post asked attorneys ranked on other Chambers lists to consider whether or not enough women and minority attorneys were being recognized by the research firm.
"For those outstanding lawyers in other sectors and regions that are ranked in any of the legal directories, please take a moment to consider whether those rankings fully reflect the diversity of talented lawyers in your field," he wrote. "If they do not, take action!"
|Read More
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAs Tech-Focused Roles in C-Suite Expand, Newcomers Embrace Big Law Opportunities
What About the Old Partners Who Have No Interest in AI?
Avantia CEO Discuss Blurring Lines Between Law Firm, Software Provider and ALSP
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250