The case of a Colorado 4-year-old girl who was strip searched by a government social worker could prompt the U.S. Supreme Court to take a new look at its “qualified immunity” doctrine that lets officials off the hook in some circumstances when they violate an individual’s civil rights.

At the court’s May 16 private conference, the justices will consider whether to grant review in the case of I.B. v. Woodard. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in January dismissed the girl’s claim that case worker April Woodard violated the Fourth Amendment by stripping and photographing her without a warrant or parental consent. The search came after allegations that the child had been abused.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]