Trump Labor Dept. Lawyer Sanctioned for 'Bad Judgment' in Litigating Private Suit
Career ethics officials at the US Labor Department determined Michael Avakian, the associate deputy secretary, had "not knowingly violated a criminal statute or particular ethics rule" in filing papers on behalf of a private client while serving in the government.
March 04, 2019 at 06:13 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
A top U.S. Labor Department lawyer who continued to represent a private client in a federal court case against a union was suspended for two weeks without pay last year for exercising “bad judgment,” the agency said.
Michael Avakian was formerly the principal member in the Washington office of Atlanta-based Wimberly, Lawson, Steckel, Schneider & Stine before joining the Labor Department in April as associate deputy secretary in the agency's front office.
Avakian, representing the steel company D5 Iron Works Inc., filed court papers July 30 in a pending case in Indiana federal court against a labor union. The company alleges the union is responsible for a “violent attack” in an attempt to secure a collective bargaining agreement.
Before joining the Labor Department, Avakian reportedly told ethics officials about the ongoing case in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, the Labor Department said in a statement.
Labor Department ethics officials advised Avakian to wind down the litigation, an agency representative said. Avakian said the filings in July were his final pleadings. Avakian withdrew from the case Aug. 2, citing a “change in jobs.”
The Labor Department said Avakian should have taken more steps to end his involvement in the Indiana litigation.
“Even though career ethics officials determined that Michael had not knowingly violated a criminal statute or particular ethics rule, the department concluded that Michael exercised bad judgment in not taking more expeditious steps to wrap up his participation in the ongoing litigation,” the agency spokesperson said.
Avakian agreed not to accept compensation for the work he did on the case during the time he was also employed at the Labor Department. Bloomberg Law first reported the sanction against Avakian.
Messages seeking comment that were sent to Avakian's Labor Department email address and to his Wimberly email were not immediately responded to.
Avakian said in his financial disclosure, obtained by The National Law Journal, that his “practice [was] terminated before entry into government service.” He said he “retain[s] a contingency fees interest in cases with Wimberly, Lawson & Avakian (value not readily ascertainable) and any recovery obtained. Outstanding fees billed will be forwarded as received.”
The disclosure did not identify clients for whom Avakian provided legal services. The sources of income were identified as the Wimberly firm, and consulting work for the Center on National Labor Policy Inc.
➤➤ Get employment law news and commentary straight to your in-box with Labor of Law, a new Law.com briefing. Learn more and sign up here.
The Labor Department concluded that Avakian did not use government resources in his representation of the private client while serving as an agency lawyer. As associate deputy secretary, Avakian serves under Deputy Secretary Patrick Pizzella and Secretary Alexander Acosta.
“The incident highlighted the importance of providing specific advice on appropriate timeframes for winding down matters,” a Labor Department spokeswoman said.
Avakian, a veteran labor and employment attorney, earlier represented the company Hy-Brand Industrial Contractors in a case confronting the Obama-era joint employment standard at the National Labor Relations Board.
Trump-appointed NLRB leaders tried unsuccessfully to use Avakian's case to create a more business-friendly standard, but an ethics conflict involving one of the board members stopped the effort. The labor board is now involved in a rule-making process to overturn the Obama-era standard.
|Read more:
Ex-Kirkland & Ellis Lawyers Get Waivers to Work With Former Colleagues
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Rapidly Closing Window': Progressive Groups Urge Senate Votes on Biden's Judicial Nominees
5 minute readBig Law Practice Leaders 'Bullish' That Second Trump Presidency Will Be Good for Business
3 minute readTrump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250