Future McGuireWoods Partner Denounced Blackface Yearbook Photos 39 Years Ago
"Those photos needed to be called out,” says Bradley Kutrow, now a financial services and appellate partner at McGuireWoods in North Carolina.
February 07, 2019 at 03:30 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
A college newspaper editorial written 39 years ago by Bradley Kutrow, now a McGuireWoods partner in North Carolina, gives a new perspective on how wearing blackface was regarded at the time in the South.
The recent revelations about top Virginia officials wearing blackface at earlier stages of their lives has prompted some to reach back and post yearbook photos from the 1970s and 1980s that depict students in blackface as well as in garb mirroring Ku Klux Klan robes.
The 1979 yearbook of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill contained just such a photo that was posted on Twitter by Colin Campbell, a reporter at the News & Observer in Raleigh.
The photo, on the page devoted to the Chi Phi fraternity chapter, depicts two students in Klan costumes holding a noose around a student wearing blackface. Another photo shows two students in blackface.
Full page from the 1979 yearbook, for those curious about which frat, etc. pic.twitter.com/awgpAXbLdI
— Colin Campbell (@RaleighReporter) February 6, 2019
That post went viral and, in turn, led a former reporter at the student newspaper, The Daily Tar Heel, to dig up a 1980 editorial that denounced the photographs as proof that “those who argue that racism and discrimination on this campus are ebbing have only to look at page 400 of the 1979 Yackety Yack [yearbook] for evidence to the contrary.”
Soon Kutrow, who was an associate editor of the college newspaper at the time, acknowledged on Twitter that he wrote the editorial, describing it as “too relevant nearly 40 years after I wrote it.”
Since 2008, Kutrow has been a partner in the firm's financial services litigation department and is co-chair of the firm's appeals and issues group. He majored in journalism and political science at UNC.
Kutrow wrote in the editorial, which carries a March 27, 1980, publication date:
“They were, we presume, clowning around for a photographer. Still, their callousness and insensitivity toward racism, the most deep-rooted problem confronting our society, is appalling … It may be argued, and rightly, that these pictures are indicative of the actions and attitudes of only a few individuals. Nevertheless, individuals make up organizations and organizations make up the UNC community. These photographs crystallized the racism that permeates this University in its most blatant and disturbing form.”
Former acting solicitor general and Duke University School of Law emeritus professor Walter Dellinger praised Kutrow in a tweet: “Good for Brad. Talk about a student editorial that ages well. This is it.”
In an interview Thursday, Kutrow said he had been thinking about the editorial he wrote because of recent events, but was “amazed” to see it on social media.
“It was our role at the newspaper to call out problems on the campus,” he said, adding that “I don't recall anyone leaping to the defense” of the fraternity after the editorial appeared. “It really was wrong and antithetical to our values at the university. Those photos needed to be called out.”
The emergence of the 1979 yearbook photos brought swift reactions Wednesday and Thursday from both the university and the Chi Phi fraternity. Bill Roper, interim UNC system president, said Thursday, “There's a number of things about our past that we need to understand and deal with. That's a horrific part of our past, one that I think has no place then or now in our university system.”
The fraternity on Wednesday tweeted, “We strongly denounce the behavior and sentiments displayed in these images. Bigotry is not welcome in our Fraternity.”
|
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUS Judge Rejects Morgan Stanley Reconsideration Bid in Deferred Compensation Litigation
Transgender Woman Awarded $150K Default Judgment Against Corrections Officer for Alleged Assault
Legal Speak: A Convicted Felon is Coming to the White House. What Happens Now?
1 minute readAT&T General Counsel Joins ADM Board as Company Reels From Accounting Scandal
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250