This Law School Is Hitting the Road—On a Seven-Person Bike
Campbell University Norman Adrian Wiggins School of Law is the first university program in the United States to obtain a conference bike, which seats seven and lets groups conduct meetings as they cycle around town.
November 01, 2018 at 12:47 PM
3 minute read
Rich Leonard got a fair share of weird looks from passersby as he cycled around Raleigh, North Carolina, on Wednesday.
That's probably because the dean of the Campbell University Norman Adrian Wiggins School of Law wasn't riding solo—he had six other law school staffers onboard the school's new conference bike.
Yes, you read that right: Conference bike.
Campbell Law looks to be the first university program in the United States to obtain a so-called conference bike, which is pretty much what it sounds like: a moving contraption that seats seven people on which you can conduct meetings while peddling around town.
Leonard understands if that sounds a little crazy, but bear with him.
“The idea is—especially in North Carolina where our climate is temperate most of the year—if you are some of my staff, or a subcommittee, if you're a student leadership group, if you're a faculty member with your advisees and you want to talk about something and get some exercise and fresh air while you do it, you can get on the bike and tool around town,” Leonard said Wednesday after taking the conference bike out for its maiden voyage.
Leonard got the idea last spring after seeing a conference bike in Vienna, where he was attending an arbitration moot court competition with students. He immediately began investigating what it would take to get one for the law school. Campbell already has some experience on the bike front. Leonard started a bike share program three years ago, where students can check out one of four loaner bikes that are kept in the school's lobby. Students often use the bikes to zip over to externships at law firms and courts, Leonard said.
But the conference bike goes a big step further. It's made in Holland, and it took five months to get, in part because Leonard insisted it be made in the university's bright orange color. (This required the metal to be specially dyed.) Leonard declined to disclose how much the school paid for the bike, but said it was lower than the $12,750 listed on the manufacturer's website. He said the makers are eager to enter the U.S. market, beyond the California campuses of Google and Facebook, where they are already in use.
So what do students make of the conference bike?
“At first they were puzzled,” Leonard said. “Like, 'What has he done now?' I had to make it very clear to the students that I didn't buy this out of the operational budget. I have some very generous donors who give me money to do edgy, creative things that get the law school noticed.”
People have certainly noticed the bike around Raleigh. The school has only had it for a week, but is already fielding questions from other community groups about whether it will loan or rent the conference bike out. The school plans to keep it close, due to liability concerns, Leonard said.
While the first ride was deemed a success, the inaugural crew learned a few lessons. Namely, that the bike is heavy. About 1,000 pounds heavy.
“We realized, coming up a hill, we've all got to pedal or you won't get up,” Leonard said. “I recommend avoiding steep hills.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'What Is Certain Is Uncertainty': Patchwork Title IX Rules Face Expected Changes in Second Trump Administration
5 minute read'No Evidence'?: Big Law Firms Defend Academic Publishers in EDNY Antitrust Case
3 minute readLaw Firms Are Turning to Online Training Platforms as Apprenticeship Model Falters
'Substantive Deficiencies': Judge Grants Big Law Motion Dismissing Ivy League Price-Fixing Claims
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250