Bay Area Lawyer Is Hired to Investigate Sexual Harassment Claims at Capitol
Amy Oppenheimer of the Law Offices of Amy Oppenheimer in Berkeley was chosen to review claims that unnamed men “groped and touched us without our consent, made inappropriate comments about our bodies and our abilities." The letter was signed by 147 lobbyists, lawmakers and staff.
October 23, 2017 at 07:06 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
The California Senate has retained a prominent Bay Area employment attorney to investigate public allegations of “pervasive” sexual harassment and abuse leveled by dozens of women who work in and around the state Capitol.
Amy Oppenheimer of the Law Offices of Amy Oppenheimer in Berkeley was chosen to review claims—publicized in a letter published Oct. 17 by the Los Angeles Times—that unnamed men “groped and touched us without our consent, made inappropriate comments about our bodies and our abilities.” The letter was signed by 147 lobbyists, lawmakers and staff.
“There's always more employers can do to protect their employees,” Senate President Pro Tempore Kevin de Leon, D-Los Angeles, said in a prepared statement on Monday. “Everyone deserves a workplace free of fear, harassment and sexual misbehavior and I applaud the courage of women working in and around the Capitol who are coming forward and making their voices heard.”
Oppenheimer's firm is a go-to source for employers, many of them public agencies, seeking training for employees in sexual harassment laws as well as investigations into allegations of workplace wrongdoing. A former arbitrator, Oppenheimer worked almost 20 years as an administrative law judge at the California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board. She is also the founder and past president of the board of the Association of Workplace Investigators Inc.
Amy OppenheimerThe University of California, Berkeley, School of Law recently retained Oppenheimer's firm to conduct Title IX training on sexual harassment and violence for all incoming J.D. students. The law school was rocked last year by allegations that then-Dean Sujit Choudhry sexually harassed his executive assistant.
Oppenheimer's firm was one of several recommended by the Senate's outside employment counsel, the law firm Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, according to a de Leon spokesman. De Leon's office said a contract—with no specified duration—was still being drafted Monday. The office declined to specify how much Oppenheimer's firm will be paid beyond “the general government rate for attorneys.”
Oppenheimer did not immediately respond to a message left at her office Monday.
The publication of the sexual harassment claims follows highly publicized allegations of sexual abuse and harassment made against Hollywood movie mogul Harvey Weinstein, which led to his abrupt resignation. The New York Attorney General's Office on Monday announced a civil investigation targeting the Weinstein company.
The letter-writers said they weren't shocked by the descriptions of Weinstein's behavior.
“As women leaders in politics, in a state that postures itself as a leader in justice and equality, you might assume our experience has been different. It has not,” they wrote. “Each of us has endured, witnessed or worked with women who have experienced some form of dehumanizing behavior by men with power in our workplaces.”
The women also launched a website, WeSaidEnough.com, that promises “a plan of action” for improving responses to harassment allegations at the Capitol.
Those who signed the letter include retired state Sen. Martha Escutia, a former Judiciary Committee chairwoman; Lea-Ann Tratten, political director of the Consumer Attorneys of California; Mariko Yoshihara, political director at the California Employment Lawyers Association; and Jennifer Wada, a contract lobbyist for the State Bar of California.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUS Judge Rejects Morgan Stanley Reconsideration Bid in Deferred Compensation Litigation
Transgender Woman Awarded $150K Default Judgment Against Corrections Officer for Alleged Assault
Legal Speak: A Convicted Felon is Coming to the White House. What Happens Now?
1 minute readAT&T General Counsel Joins ADM Board as Company Reels From Accounting Scandal
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250