Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Williams & Connolly'

You can use to get even better search results
City of Pittsburgh Comprehensive Mun. Pension Trust Fund v. Conway
Publication Date: 2024-05-06
Practice Area: Corporate Governance
Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Zurn
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Joel Friedlander, Jeffrey M. Gorris, Christopher M. Foulds, Friedlander & Gorris, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Christopher H. Lyons, Tayler D. Bolton, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, Wilmington, DE; Randall J. Baron, Benny C. Goodman III, Andrew W. Hutton, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, San Diego, CA; Gladriel Shobe, Jarrod Shobe, Shobe & Shobe, LLP, Provo, UT for plaintiff.
For defendant: Blake Rohrbacher, Matthew D. Perri, Nicole M. Henry, Morgan R. Harrison, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Robert A. Van Kirk, John Williams, Tyler Infinger, Bryan Czako, William Donnelly, Williams & Connolly LLP, Washington, DC for defendants.
Case number: 2022-0664-MTZ

Plaintiff adequately pled breach of contractual duty of good faith when general partner concealed information indicating that equityholders lacked legal leverage to force a settlement payment for the loss of tax receivable agreement rights in exchange for their approval of the corporate conversion.

May 03, 2024 | National Law Journal

DOJ, Google Conclude Closing Arguments in Search Engine Antitrust Case

"The significance of the case is not lost on me," U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta said. "Whatever the outcome, it is the result of excellent lawyering and representation."
4 minute read
Appellate Division, Second Department: May 3, 2024
Publication Date: 2024-05-03
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Second Department, Hand Down List
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Handdown List released on:May 1, 2024

Appellate Division, Second Department: May 3, 2024
Publication Date: 2024-05-03
Practice Area: Appellate Division Activity | Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion List & Order on Application
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Motion List & Order on Application released on:May 1, 2024

May 02, 2024 | National Law Journal

DOJ, Google Begin Closing Arguments in Antitrust Search Engine Case

"Google is not under the law obligated to say, 'We will step back and let you win the deal,'" said John Schmidtlein, the company's attorney. "Google is winning because it is better."
3 minute read
Law Journal Press | Digital Book State Antitrust Law Authors: William T. Lifland View this Book

View more book results for the query "Williams & Connolly"

Appellate Division, Second Department: May 1, 2024
Publication Date: 2024-05-01
Practice Area: Appellate Division Activity | Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion List & Order on Application
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Motion List & Order on Application released on:April 29, 2024

Appellate Division, Second Department: April 30,2024
Publication Date: 2024-04-30
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion List & Order on Application
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Motion List & Order on Application released on:April 26, 2024

April 29, 2024 | National Law Journal

Justices Will Eye Reach of Civil RICO Law in Medical Marijuana Case

The petitioners—Medical Marijuana Inc., Dixie Holdings LLC and the two companies' joint venture that launched Dixie X—argue that RICO does not allow plaintiffs to bring claims for civil damages stemming from a personal injury.
4 minute read
April 29, 2024 | National Law Journal

Supreme Court Will Decide How Far Plaintiffs Can Go to Return to State Court

The issue before the justices is whether removing the federal question from a complaint requires that the litigation be remanded to state court.
3 minute read
Movora, LLC v. Gendreau
Publication Date: 2024-04-29
Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
Industry: Manufacturing
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Adams
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: R. Judson Scaggs, Jr., Grant E. Michl, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Kevin M. Downey, R. Kennon Poteat III, Anna K. Tsiotsias, Ilana B. Frier, Williams & Connolly, LLP, Washington, DC for plaintiffs.
For defendant: David E. Ross, S. Reiko Rogozen, Ross Aronstam & Moritz LLP, Wilmington, DE; Andrew W. Vail, Benjamin J. Bradford, Jenner & Block LLP, Chicago, IL; Michael L. Vild, Christopher P. Simon, Cross & Simon, LLC, Wilmington, DE for defendants.
Case number: N23C-05-034 MAA CCLD

Court denied judgment on the pleadings for defendants in action to obtain contractual indemnification in business purchase agreement where plaintiffs' interpretation of the scope of the agreement's indemnification provision, including the amount of indemnification, was facially reasonable.

TRENDING STORIES

    More from ALM

    More from ALM

    Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

    Resources

    • A Buyer's Guide to Law Firm Software

      Brought to you by PracticePanther

      Download Now

    • A Step-by-Step Flight Plan for Legal Teams: Fire Up Your Productivity Engine and Deliver High-Impact Work Faster

      Brought to you by HaystackID

      Download Now

    • Corporate Transparency Act Resource Kit

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success

      Brought to you by Juris Ledger

      Download Now