Search Results

0 results for 'Ropes'

You can use to get even better search results
March 27, 2024 | Law.com

Weil Gotshal Shutters Beijing and Mulls Shanghai Closure

Weil joins a growing line of top U.S. law firms that have closed offices in mainland China as the fractious geopolitical relationship between the U.S. and China and the prolonged market downturn force the world's top-performing law firms to reconsider their investments in China.
3 minute read
March 26, 2024 | Litigation Daily

4 Out of Sidley's 5 Global IP Litigation Leaders Are Women. Here's How That's Shaped the Practice

Ching-Lee Fukuda and Aimee Fagan, who both joined Sidley's IP litigation team as laterals, discuss what brought them to the firm and their approach to leading the practice.
10 minute read
March 21, 2024 | Law.com

Clemson University, Atlantic Coast Conference Battle Over $140M Exit Penalty, Media Rights

The university also asked the court to declare the ACC's $140 million penalty to any university leaving the conference void by public policy and legally unenforceable. Clemson said the penalty imposes a nonexistent fiduciary duty on not only the university, but all conference members.
3 minute read
March 20, 2024 | National Law Journal

'Where Does It Stop': 4th Circuit Probes 2nd Amendment Test in Assault Weapons Ban Case

The appellate court is considering whether Maryland's prohibition is consistent with the United States' "history and tradition" of firearm regulation.
5 minute read
March 20, 2024 | The American Lawyer

Simpson Thacher Swoops For Weil Gotshal Partner Duo in the UK

The infrastructure moves are the latest additions to Simpson Thacher's London base and the latest departures from Weil Gotshal's.
3 minute read
Wilkinson v. Garland
Publication Date: 2024-03-19
Practice Area: Immigration Law
Industry: Federal Government
Court: U.S. Supreme Court
Judge: Judge Sotomayor
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 22-666

Immigration judge's "exceptional and extremely unusual" hardship determination is mixed question of law and fact reviewable under 8 U.S.C. §1252(a)(2)(D)

Equil IP Holdings LLC v. Akamai Tech., Inc.
Publication Date: 2024-03-18
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: David E. Moore, Bindu A. Palapura, Andrew L. Brown, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Jason R. Bartlett, Jason A. Crotty, Marc J. Pernick, Mauriel Kapouytian Woods LLP, San Francisco, CA; Steven Callahan, Christopher T. Bovenkamp, Charhon Callahan Robson & Garza, PLLC, Dallas, TX for plaintiff.
For defendant: Adam W. Poff, Robert M. Vrana, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE; James R. Batchelder, James L. Davis, Jr., Daniel W. Richards, Ropes & Gray LLP, East Palo Alto, CA; Colin P. Dunn, Ropes & Gray LLP, New York, NY for defendant.
Case number: 22-677-RGA

Court dismissed inequitable conduct/unclean hands defenses where there were no allegations as to how alleged fraudulent misrepresentations affected the validity of the patent-in-suit and the allegations of fraud failed to meet the particularity requirement.

Lance Wolfanger v. Once Again Nut Butter Collective Inc.
Publication Date: 2024-03-16
Practice Area: Civil Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Judge: Unsigned Lindley, J.P., Curran, Montour, Ogden, and Nowak, JJ.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 0895

Lance Wolfanger v. Once Again Nut Butter Collective Inc.

March 15, 2024 | Litigation Daily

Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout Outs

Visa and Mastercard can't escape the latest round of swipe fee antitrust litigation on summary judgment.
7 minute read
Cortlandt Street Recovery Corp. v. Bonderman
Publication Date: 2024-03-15
Practice Area: Corporate Entities
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department
Judge: Justice Martin Shulman
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For Respondent-Appellant: David B. Goroff of the bar of the State of Illinois, admitted pro hac vice, Alissa M. Nann and Peter N. Wang of counsel, Foley & Lardner LLP, New York.
For defendant: For Appellants-Respondents: Paul M. O'Connor, III, David J. Abrams and Andrew H. Elkin of counsel, Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP, New York. For Giancarlo Aliberti, Respondent: Anthony M. Candido of counsel, Clifford Chance US, LLP, New York. For Apax Partners, L.P., Respondent: Robert S. Fischler, Gregg L. Weiner and Alexander B. Simkin of counsel, Ropes & Gray LLP, New York.
Case number: 653357/11

No Issue of Fact as to How Defendants Exercised 'Complete Domination' Over Companies

Resources