0 results for 'Halloran'
Appellate Division, First Department: November 27, 2023
Publication Date: 2023-11-27 Practice Area: Civil Appeals |
Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department, Appeals & Motions Judge: Unsigned Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: DOCKET
Appeals & Motions List released on:November 21, 2023
Appellate Term, Second Department: November 24, 2023
Publication Date: 2023-11-24 Practice Area: Civil Appeals |
Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Term, Second Department, Second, Eleventh and Thirteenth Judicial Districts Judge: Unsigned Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: DOCKET
Decision & Orders on Motions decided on:September 8, 2023
Supreme Court Determines Breach of Fiduciary Duty Claims Against Trustee Survive Summary Judgment
"Because the trial court incorrectly concluded that the defendant had no duty to protect and collect potential trust assets, such as the undistributed residuary assets at issue in this case, the court did not consider whether the plaintiffs adduced sufficient evidence to survive summary judgment on the issue of the defendant's alleged breach of her fiduciary duty," the opinion said. "Our review of the record reveals that genuine issues of material fact exist with respect to the allegations of the defendant's breach of fiduciary duty in the present case."
Litigants Plan to Donate Any Award From Wrongful-Death Lawsuit
"One of the biggest tragedies is when a parent loses a child, and in this case, these are parents who did everything they could," Ernie Teitell, one of the attorneys for the plaintiff, said. "They don't want this to happen to another family."
Katzoff v. BSP Agency, LLC
Publication Date: 2023-10-31 Practice Area: Business Torts
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court, New York Judge: Justice Margaret A. Chan Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: 655823/2020
Motion to Amend Compliant Granted; Defendants Would Not Be Prejudiced
See Who Passed the July 2023 New York Bar Exam
Of the 9,779 candidates who took the most recent bar exam, 6,481 passed for an overall passing rate of 66%.
Appellate Division, First Department: October 19, 2023
Publication Date: 2023-10-19 Practice Area: Civil Appeals |
Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department, Appeals & Motions Judge: Unsigned Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: DOCKET
Appeals & Motions List released on:October 17, 2023
Appellate Division, Second Department: October 13, 2023
Publication Date: 2023-10-13 Practice Area: Appellate Division Activity |
Civil Appeals |
Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion List & Order on Application Judge: Unsigned Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: DOCKET
Motion List, Scheduling Orders & Order on Application released on:October 10 & 11, 2023
East 163 Street LLC v. Hill
Publication Date: 2023-10-12 Practice Area: Landlord Tenant Law
Industry:
Court: Civil Court, Bronx Judge: Judge Diane E. Lutwak Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: 305427-23/BX
Failure to Register Rent Stabilized Building With DHCR Defeats Eviction Proceeding
Light v. Davis
Publication Date: 2023-10-09 Practice Area: Government
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware Judge: District Judge Burke Attorneys: For plaintiff: James G. McMillan, III, William E. Green, Jr., Halloran Farkas + Kittila LLP, Wilmington, DE; Mark C. Rifkin, Benjamin Y. Kaufman, Freeman & Herz LLP, New York, NY; Arthur Susman, Law Office of Arthur Susman, Chicago, IL for plaintiff. For defendant: Arthur G. Connolly, Max B. Walton, Christina M. Thompson, Lisa R. Hatfield, Connolly Gallagher LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendants. Case number: 22-611-CJB
Concluding that a litigant does not have a cognizable property interest in abandoned property, the court dismissed plaintiff's complaint challenging the constitutionality of Delaware's Abandoned and Unclaimed Property Law. In addition, the court dismissed the complaint on ripeness grounds concluding that because the questions of whether plaintiff would actually make a claim on the property and be able to sufficiently demonstrate his ownership rights were unanswered, the parties' interests were not sufficiently adverse to give rise to
Trending Stories
- 1A Novel (and 'Funnier') Ranking System for Law Schools: How Many Mentions in the Times
- 2Insights on M&A Trends: Midyear 2024 Expert Roundtable
- 3Law.com's Top 100 Verdicts of 2023
- 4Ex-Judge Tatel Regrets Focusing Clerk Hiring on Applicants from Elite Law Schools
- 5Dallas Firm That Won $45M Talc Verdict Scored Again: Jury Hits J&J With $260M
More from ALM
- Morgan & Morgan Class Action Attorneys Detail Pathway to Success Within Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Practice 1 minute read
- Holwell Shuster & Goldberg Partners Leverage 'Hostile' Witnesses to Secure $101 Million Verdict Against Walmart 1 minute read
- Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference Midwest 2024: Mike Andolina, Partner, White & Case 1 minute read
Resources
Good Legal Technology is Good Business: A Case for Bringing Employment Issues In-House
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
Insights and Strategies for Effective Succession Planning in AM Law 100 Firms
Brought to you by Gallagher
Download Now
State AI Legislation Is on the Move in 2024
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
2024 ESI Risk Management & Litigation Readiness Report
Brought to you by Pagefreezer
Download Now