By Ross Todd | March 2, 2020
A federal magistrate judge granted Nextiva's motion to dismiss claims that it faked online reviews about cloud-based communications service rival RingCentral, but gave RingCentral a chance to amend its complaint.
By Amanda Bronstad | March 2, 2020
Apple Inc. has agreed to pay between $310 million and $500 million to settle class actions alleging that it surreptitiously slowed older iPhones with software upgrades. The deal would include potentially $25 payments to class members and $93 million in attorney fees.
By Scott Graham | February 14, 2020
Things did not go so well for the Federal Trade Commission, or the Department of Justice for that matter, at a hearing before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
By Scott Graham | February 14, 2020
The company had brought trade secret and copyright claims against a Chinese-based competitor, accusing former Motorola employees of taking proprietary source code for the operation of digital mobile radios.
By Scott Graham | February 13, 2020
Over an hourlong hearing, three judges hammered the Federal Trade Commission over its antitrust theory while suggesting Qualcomm shouldn't be penalized for succeeding.
By Amanda Bronstad | February 13, 2020
Thursday's ruling by the California Supreme Court comes more than two years after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit sought clarification in a class action brought by Apple store workers in California who sought pay for time spent during searches of their bags before leaving work.
By Ross Todd | February 4, 2020
The plaintiffs claim that the mobile payment company violates the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by sending unauthorized text messages to consumers via its SquareUp loyalty program.
By Scott Graham | December 26, 2019
WestView Capital takes a majority stake as Unified looks to scale up plans for deterring patent abuse.
By Ross Todd | December 19, 2019
Although U.S. District Judge Edward Davila dismissed claims brought under California privacy laws without leave to amend, he gave plaintiffs another shot at pleading their claims that Google violated users' right to privacy under the state's constitution.
By Scott Graham | December 5, 2019
The Federal Circuit rules that the wireless giant is entitled to a jury trial over infringement of its standard-essential patents. The decision wipes out a 2017 bench trial in which U.S. District Judge James Selna had established the "top-down" methodology for evaluating SEPs.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Celebrate outstanding achievement in law firms, chambers, in-house legal departments and alternative business structures.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Epstein Becker & Green is seeking an associate to joins its Commercial Litigation practice in our Columbus or Cincinnati offices. Ca...
Job Opportunity: Location: Prestigious Florida Law Firm seeks to hire a Business attorney with at least 5 years of experience for their Ft. ...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS