9th Cir.; 14-35505 The court of appeals affirmed a judgment. The court held that the U.S. Forest Service did not violate either the National Forest Management…
September 11, 2017 at 06:29 PM
1 minute read
9th Cir.;
14-35505
The court of appeals affirmed a judgment. The court held that the U.S. Forest Service did not violate either the National Forest Management Act (NFMA) or the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) in approving designated parking for motorized recreationalists in a national forest.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
