C.A. 1st;
A147966
The First Appellate District affirmed a judgment. The court held that an employee’s termination arising from his marriage to his employer’s daughter did not give rise to a claim of marital status discrimination.
C.A. 1st; A147966 The First Appellate District affirmed a judgment. The court held that an employee’s termination arising from his marriage to…
September 06, 2017 at 06:00 PM
1 minute read
C.A. 1st;
A147966
The First Appellate District affirmed a judgment. The court held that an employee’s termination arising from his marriage to his employer’s daughter did not give rise to a claim of marital status discrimination.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS